Taking environmental partnerships seriously

被引:18
|
作者
Wassmer, Ulrich [1 ]
Pain, Guillaume [2 ]
Paquin, Raymond L. [2 ]
机构
[1] EMLYON Business Sch, F-619130 Ecully, France
[2] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, 1455 Maisonneuve Blvd W, Montreal, PQ H1H 1L8, Canada
关键词
Environmental partnership; Business environmentalism; Company collaboration; Corporate sustainability; Competitive cooperation; SUSTAINABILITY; ALLIANCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bushor.2016.09.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Increasingly, firms are integrating environmental sustainability into their business strategies. Yet, sustainability is a complex topic and many firms need to form environmental partnerships to access additional resources-in the form of investments, technologies, expertise, public image, and/or political influence-to develop competitive advantage. Environmental partnership decisions are difficult, however, because they often need to reconcile multifaceted sustainability issues with multilevel, and potentially divergent, strategic goals. To meet their intended objectives, companies should carefully consider the type of environmental partnerships and partners that can best meet their needs. Based on a review of the literature, interviews with executives responsible for environmental partnerships, and publicly available data, we find firms engage in three main types of environmental partnerships: innovation-seeking, legitimacy-building, and policy-influencing. Each type of partnership benefits from different types of resources and partner choices. Herein, we describe the advantages of each type of environmental partnership and partners that may best support them. Given that many firms develop environmental partnership portfolios, managing multiple environmental partnerships simultaneously, we also discuss the implications of our research for environmental partnership portfolios. (C) 2016 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Taking games seriously
    Light, Jennifer
    TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE, 2008, 49 (02) : 347 - 375
  • [32] TAKING SOCIALISM SERIOUSLY
    HINDESS, B
    ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 1991, 20 (04) : 363 - 379
  • [33] Taking luck seriously
    Zimmerman, MJ
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2002, 99 (11): : 553 - 576
  • [34] Taking Politics Seriously
    Blattberg, Charles
    PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 94 (02) : 271 - 294
  • [35] Taking cholera seriously
    Dixon, Bernard
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 10 (01): : 7 - 7
  • [36] On Taking Monism Seriously
    Nunn, Chris
    JOURNAL OF CONSCIOUSNESS STUDIES, 2013, 20 (9-10) : 77 - 88
  • [37] Taking fathers seriously
    Featherstone, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2003, 33 (02): : 239 - 254
  • [38] Taking Children Seriously
    Mary Renck Jalongo
    Laura Stevenson
    Abigail C. Davis
    Marjorie L. Stanek
    Early Childhood Education Journal, 2010, 38 (1) : 1 - 3
  • [39] Taking Asia Seriously
    Griffiths, Martin
    Wesley, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 45 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [40] Taking reading seriously
    Squibbs, Richard J.
    EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY STUDIES, 2007, 40 (04) : 655 - 658