Global raptor research and conservation priorities: Tropical raptors fall prey to knowledge gaps

被引:126
|
作者
Buechley, Evan R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santangeli, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Girardello, Marco [6 ]
Neate-Clegg, Montague H. C. [2 ]
Oleyar, Dave [1 ]
McClure, Christopher J. W. [7 ]
Sekercioglu, Cagan H. [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] HawkWatch Int, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Smithsonian Migratory Bird Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Museum Nat Hist, Helsinki Lab Ornithol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Acores, Dept Ciencias & Engn Ambiente, cE3c, Azorean Biodivers Grp, Angra Do Heroismo, Portugal
[7] Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID USA
[8] Koc Univ, Coll Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
avian biology; biogeography; conservation biology; conservation prioritization; ecology; extinction; ornithology; predator; EXTINCTION RISK; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST; DECLINE; CLASSIFICATION; RATIONALE; PREDATORS; BEHAVIOR; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12901
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Raptors serve critical ecological functions, are particularly extinction-prone and are often used as environmental indicators and flagship species. Yet, there is no global framework to prioritize research and conservation actions on them. We identify for the first time the factors driving extinction risk and scientific attention on raptors and develop a novel research and conservation priority index (RCPI) to identify global research and conservation priorities. Location Global. Methods We use random forest models based on ecological traits and extrinsic data to identify the drivers of risk and scientific attention in all raptors. We then map global research and conservation priorities. Lastly, we model where priorities fall relative to country-level human social indicators. Results Raptors with small geographic ranges, scavengers, forest-dependent species and those with slow life histories are particularly extinction-prone. Research is extremely biased towards a small fraction of raptor species: 10 species (1.8% of all raptors) account for one-third of all research, while one-fifth of species have no publications. Species with small geographic ranges and those inhabiting less developed countries are greatly understudied. Regions of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia are identified as particularly high priority for raptor research and conservation. These priorities are highly concentrated in developing countries, indicating a global mismatch between priorities and capacity for research and conservation. Main conclusions A redistribution of scientific attention and conservation efforts towards developing tropical countries and the least-studied, extinction-prone species is critical to conserve raptors and their ecological functions worldwide. We identify clear taxonomic and geographic research and conservation priorities for all raptors, and our methodology can be applied across other taxa to prioritize scientific investment.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 869
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Knowledge gaps and priorities for research on prevention of HPV infection and cervical cancer
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    Bosch, F. Xavier
    Cuzick, Jack
    Schiller, John T.
    Garnett, Geoffrey P.
    Meheus, Andre
    Wright, Thomas C.
    VACCINE, 2006, 24 : 242 - 249
  • [32] Mediterranean sea turtles: current knowledge and priorities for conservation and research
    Casale, Paolo
    Broderick, Annette C.
    Caminas, Juan Antonio
    Cardona, Luis
    Carreras, Carlos
    Demetropoulos, Andreas
    Fuller, Wayne J.
    Godley, Brendan J.
    Hochscheid, Sandra
    Kaska, Yakup
    Lazar, Bojan
    Margaritoulis, Dimitris
    Panagopoulou, Aliki
    Rees, Alan F.
    Tomas, Jesus
    Turkozan, Oguz
    ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH, 2018, 36 : 229 - 267
  • [33] Orchid conservation and research: An analysis of gaps and priorities for globally Red Listed species
    Jenna Wraith
    Patrick Norman
    Catherine Pickering
    Ambio, 2020, 49 : 1601 - 1611
  • [34] Orchid conservation and research: An analysis of gaps and priorities for globally Red Listed species
    Wraith, Jenna
    Norman, Patrick
    Pickering, Catherine
    AMBIO, 2020, 49 (10) : 1601 - 1611
  • [35] A scoping review of autism research conducted in Central Asia: Knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Zakirova-Engstrand, Rano
    Yakubova, Gulnoza
    AUTISM, 2024, 28 (02) : 342 - 354
  • [36] A review of ecological gradient research in the Tropics: identifying research gaps, future directions, and conservation priorities
    Jannes Muenchow
    Petra Dieker
    Jürgen Kluge
    Michael Kessler
    Henrik von Wehrden
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2018, 27 : 273 - 285
  • [37] A review of ecological gradient research in the Tropics: identifying research gaps, future directions, and conservation priorities
    Muenchow, Jannes
    Dieker, Petra
    Kluge, Jurgen
    Kessler, Michael
    von Wehrden, Henrik
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 27 (02) : 273 - 285
  • [38] Seahorse Aquaculture, Biology and Conservation: Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities
    Cohen, Felipe P. A.
    Valenti, Wagner C.
    Planas, Miquel
    Calado, Ricardo
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE, 2017, 25 (01) : 100 - 111
  • [39] Integrating traditional ecological knowledge into US public land management: Knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Souther, Sara
    Colombo, Sarah
    Lyndon, Nanebah N.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [40] Tranexamic acid and trauma: current status and knowledge gaps with recommended research priorities
    Reade, Michael C.
    Pitt, Veronica
    Gruen, Russell L.
    SHOCK, 2013, 40 (02): : 160 - 161