Global raptor research and conservation priorities: Tropical raptors fall prey to knowledge gaps

被引:126
|
作者
Buechley, Evan R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santangeli, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Girardello, Marco [6 ]
Neate-Clegg, Montague H. C. [2 ]
Oleyar, Dave [1 ]
McClure, Christopher J. W. [7 ]
Sekercioglu, Cagan H. [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] HawkWatch Int, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Smithsonian Migratory Bird Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Museum Nat Hist, Helsinki Lab Ornithol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Sustainabil Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Acores, Dept Ciencias & Engn Ambiente, cE3c, Azorean Biodivers Grp, Angra Do Heroismo, Portugal
[7] Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID USA
[8] Koc Univ, Coll Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
avian biology; biogeography; conservation biology; conservation prioritization; ecology; extinction; ornithology; predator; EXTINCTION RISK; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; BIODIVERSITY; FOREST; DECLINE; CLASSIFICATION; RATIONALE; PREDATORS; BEHAVIOR; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12901
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim Raptors serve critical ecological functions, are particularly extinction-prone and are often used as environmental indicators and flagship species. Yet, there is no global framework to prioritize research and conservation actions on them. We identify for the first time the factors driving extinction risk and scientific attention on raptors and develop a novel research and conservation priority index (RCPI) to identify global research and conservation priorities. Location Global. Methods We use random forest models based on ecological traits and extrinsic data to identify the drivers of risk and scientific attention in all raptors. We then map global research and conservation priorities. Lastly, we model where priorities fall relative to country-level human social indicators. Results Raptors with small geographic ranges, scavengers, forest-dependent species and those with slow life histories are particularly extinction-prone. Research is extremely biased towards a small fraction of raptor species: 10 species (1.8% of all raptors) account for one-third of all research, while one-fifth of species have no publications. Species with small geographic ranges and those inhabiting less developed countries are greatly understudied. Regions of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia are identified as particularly high priority for raptor research and conservation. These priorities are highly concentrated in developing countries, indicating a global mismatch between priorities and capacity for research and conservation. Main conclusions A redistribution of scientific attention and conservation efforts towards developing tropical countries and the least-studied, extinction-prone species is critical to conserve raptors and their ecological functions worldwide. We identify clear taxonomic and geographic research and conservation priorities for all raptors, and our methodology can be applied across other taxa to prioritize scientific investment.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 869
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pond ecology and conservation: research priorities and knowledge gaps
    Hill, Matthew J.
    Greaves, Helen M.
    Sayer, Carl D.
    Hassall, Christopher
    Milin, Melanie
    Milner, Victoria S.
    Marazzi, Luca
    Hall, Ruth
    Harper, Lynsey R.
    Thornhill, Ian
    Walton, Richard
    Biggs, Jeremy
    Ewald, Naomi
    Law, Alan
    Willby, Nigel
    White, James C.
    Briers, Robert A.
    Mathers, Kate L.
    Jeffries, Michael J.
    Wood, Paul J.
    ECOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (12):
  • [2] Conservation status and threats to lovebirds: knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Dueker, Sascha
    Willows-Munro, Sandi
    Perrin, Michael R.
    Abebe, Yilma D.
    Annorbah, Nathaniel N. D.
    Mwangi, Esther W.
    Madindou, Ireene R.
    Tekalign, Wondimagegnehu
    Mori, Emiliano
    Mzumara, Tiwonge, I
    Brown, Chris
    Bryson, Ursula
    Ndithia, Henry
    Dodman, Tim
    van der Zwan, Henriette
    van der Sluis, Rencia
    Phiri, Chaona R.
    Karimanzira, Abigail
    Martin, Rowan O.
    OSTRICH, 2023, 94 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [3] Critical knowledge gaps and research priorities in global soil salinity
    Hopmans, Jan W.
    Qureshi, A. S.
    Kisekka, I.
    Munns, R.
    Grattan, S. R.
    Rengasamy, P.
    Ben-Gal, A.
    Assouline, S.
    Javaux, M.
    Minhas, P. S.
    Raats, P. A. C.
    Skaggs, T. H.
    Wang, G.
    van Lier, Q. De Jong
    Jiao, H.
    Lavadon, R. S.
    Lazarovitch, N.
    Li, B.
    Taleisnik, E.
    ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 169, 2021, 169 : 1 - 191
  • [4] Knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Beech Bark Disease: Proceedings of the Beech Bark Disease Symposium, 2005, 133 : 70 - 70
  • [5] Knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Beech Bark Disease: Proceedings of the Beech Bark Disease Symposium, 2005, 133 : 96 - 96
  • [6] Knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Beech Bark Disease: Proceedings of the Beech Bark Disease Symposium, 2005, 133 : 113 - 113
  • [7] Coronavirus research: knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Perlman, Stanley
    Peiris, Malik
    NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 21 (03) : 125 - 126
  • [8] Coronavirus research: knowledge gaps and research priorities
    Stanley Perlman
    Malik Peiris
    Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2023, 21 : 125 - 126
  • [9] Knowledge gaps and conservation priorities for west African chelonians
    McGovern, Pearson
    Luiselli, Luca
    AMPHIBIA-REPTILIA, 2023, 44 (02) : 121 - 137
  • [10] Tropical conservation: perspectives on local and global priorities
    不详
    ECOLOGY, 2017, 98 (03) : 887 - 889