Environmental inequity in England: Small area associations between socio-economic status and environmental pollution

被引:84
|
作者
Briggs, David [1 ]
Abellan, Juan J. [1 ]
Fecht, Daniela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London W2 1PG, England
关键词
Environmental equity; Environmental justice; Deprivation; Socio-economic status (SES); UK; Pollution;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Recent studies have suggested that more deprived people tend to live in areas characterised by higher levels of environmental pollution. If generally true, these environmental inequities may combine to cause adverse effects on health and also exacerbate problems of confounding in epidemiological studies. Previous studies of environmental inequity have nevertheless indicated considerable complexity in the associations involved, which merit further investigation using more detailed data and more advanced analytical methods. This study investigates the ways in which environmental inequity in England varies in relation to: (a) different environmental pollutants (measured in different ways); (b) different aspects of socio-economic status: and (c) different geographical scales and contexts (urban vs. rural). Associations were analysed between the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD2004) and its domains and five sets of environmental pollutants (relating to road traffic, industry, electro-magnetic frequency radiation, disinfection by-products in drinking water and radon), measured in terms of proximity, emission intensity and environmental concentration. Associations were assessed using bivariate and multivariate correlation, and by comparing the highest and lowest quintiles of deprivation using Student's t-test and Hotelling's T2. Associations are generally weak (R-2 < 0.10), and vary depending on the specific measures used. Strongest associations occur with what can be regarded as contingent components of deprivation (e.g. crime, living environment, health) rather than causative factors such as income, employment or education. Associations also become stronger with increasing level of spatial aggregation. Overall, the results suggest that any triple jeopardy for health, and problems of confounding, associated with environmental inequities are likely to be limited. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1612 / 1629
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enset plant (Ensete ventricosum) for socio-economic and environmental uses in Gurage area of Ethiopia
    Aneseyee, Abreham Berta
    Yitbarek, Teshome
    Hailu, Yenenesh
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2022, 16
  • [32] Socio-economic and environmental vulnerability to heat-related phenomena in Bucharest metropolitan area
    Grigorescu, Ines
    Mocanu, Irena
    Mitrica, Bianca
    Dumitrascu, Monica
    Dumitrica, Cristina
    Dragota, Carmen-Sofia
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 192
  • [33] The German Environmental Survey for Children (GerES IV): Socio-Economic Status and Exposure to Pollutants
    Seiwert, M.
    Conrad, A.
    Becker, K.
    Huenken, A.
    Schulz, C.
    Kolossa-Gehring, M.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : S250 - S250
  • [34] A lack of credible evidence for a relationship between socio-economic status and dietary patterns: a response to 'Associations between socio-economic status and dietary patterns in US black and white adults'
    Archer, Edward
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2016, 115 (08) : 1438 - 1438
  • [35] Energy security for socio-economic and environmental sustainability in Pakistan
    Nawaz, Shahzada M. Naeem
    Alvi, Shahzad
    HELIYON, 2018, 4 (10):
  • [36] IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION ON COUNTRY SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
    Huseynov, Arif G.
    MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS, 2021, (02): : 293 - 302
  • [37] Environmental change and socio-economic response in the Baltic region
    Harff, J.
    Wittkowski, A.
    Zorita, E.
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (01) : 3 - 4
  • [38] Socio-economic, environmental, and governance impacts of illegal logging
    Reboredo F.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2013, 33 (2) : 295 - 304
  • [39] ENVIRONMENTAL RISK AS A PROBLEM FOR THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION
    Pozmogov, Anatoly
    Kallagov, Boris
    Tedeeva, Zalina
    Kuchieva, Marina
    Gergaeva, Alena
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (03): : 6873 - 6876
  • [40] Navigating between socio-economic viability and environmental impacts: The sachets and sticks paradox
    Rangel-Buitrago, Nelson
    Galgani, Francois
    Neal, William J.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 920