Birthweight of singletons born after cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer in fresh and warming cycles

被引:27
|
作者
De Vos, Anick [1 ]
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel [1 ]
Van Landuyt, Lisbet [1 ]
Van de Velde, Hilde [1 ]
Tournaye, Herman [1 ]
Verheyen, Greta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Ctr Reprod Med, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
cleavage-stage transfer; blastocyst transfer; birthweight; vitrification; neonatal outcome; IN-VITRO CULTURE; EMBRYO-TRANSFER; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; EXTENDED CULTURE; INCREASED RISK; PRETERM BIRTH; CRYOPRESERVATION; VITRIFICATION; PREGNANCIES;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dex361
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY QUESTION: Does extended culture to the blastocyst stage affect singleton birthweight after either fresh or vitrified-warmed embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Singleton birthweight z-scores did not vary significantly after a fresh blastocyst transfer, whereas the additional effect of vitrification remains inconclusive. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Observational studies have associated extended culture with an increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight. On the contrary, in terms of birthweight and gestational age, singletons born after vitrification have been associated with a better perinatal outcome when compared to those born following a fresh transfer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Our post-hoc cohort analysis on neonatal outcomes included 447 liveborn singletons was derived from a recent retrospective analysis on cumulative live birth rates after cleavage-stage and blastocyst transfers. These babies were born following a fresh single cleavage-stage transfer (FCT Day 3, n = 113), fresh single blastocyst transfer (FBT Day 5, n = 218), vitrified-warmed cleavage-stage transfer (VCT Day 3, n = 58) or vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT Day 5, n = 58). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Singleton birthweight was the primary outcome measure. Gestational age and gender of the newborn were accounted for by using birthweight z-scores in a multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusting for other confounders (maternal age, BMI, parity and smoking behaviour). Vanishing twins were excluded from the analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A significantly lower z-score was observed after blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer in the vitrified-warmed Day 5 group (P = 0.013), a difference not observed in the fresh transfer groups (P = 0.32). Following multivariable regression analysis [adjusted regression coefficient (95% confidence interval)], the FCT and FBT groups showed no significant influence on the birthweight z-scores after fresh transfer [-0.19 (-0.44; 0.05)], but the transfer of vitrified blastocysts (VBT) was associated with a lower birthweight [-0.52 (-0.90; -0.15)] compared with the transfer of vitrified cleavage-stage embryos (VCT). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The present cohort was relatively small, especially in the vitrified-warmed subgroups. Pregnancy-associated factors possibly influencing birthweight (such as diabetes, hypertension, pre-eclampsia) were also not accounted for in the analysis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Different ART procedures, including extended culture and vitrification, may hold potential safety issues. These results require further confirmation in future larger studies.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 201
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extending the culture of cleavage-stage embryos to the blastocyst stage after warming increases the chance of live birth: does it have a regenerative effect?
    Onalan, Gogsen
    Tunc, Mehmet
    Tohma, Aytac
    Gunakan, Emre
    Eryilmaz, Tahir
    Zeyneloglu, Hulusi B.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (06) : 1969 - 1974
  • [32] Blastocyst transfer for all? Higher cumulative live birth chance in a blastocyst-stage transfer policy compared to a cleavage-stage transfer policy
    Di Croo, I
    Colman, R.
    De Sutter, P.
    Tilleman, K.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2019, 11 (02): : 169 - 176
  • [33] COMPARISON OF METHYLATION STATUS IN CHILDREN BORN AFTER EMBRYO TRANSFER AT BLASTOCYST STAGE VERSUS AT CLEAVAGE STAGE
    Katagiri, Y.
    Aoki, C.
    Fukuda, Y.
    So, A.
    Tanaka, M.
    Morita, M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S179 - S180
  • [34] Extending the culture of cleavage-stage embryos to the blastocyst stage after warming increases the chance of live birth: does it have a regenerative effect?
    Göğşen Önalan
    Mehmet Tunç
    Aytaç Tohma
    Emre Günakan
    Tahir Eryılmaz
    Hulusi B. Zeyneloğlu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 1969 - 1974
  • [35] Effects of high three pro-nuclei (3PN) proportion incidence on clinical outcomes in the fresh cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryo transfer (ET) cycles
    Li, Mingzhao
    Xue, Xia
    Zhao, Wanqiu
    Li, Wei
    Shi, Juanzi
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 33 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [36] Elevated estradiol levels on hCG trigger day adversely effects on the clinical pregnancy rates of blastocyst embryo transfer but not cleavage-stage embryo transfer in fresh cycles: a retrospective cohort study
    Meng, Yue
    Tao, Linlin
    Xia, Tingting
    Zhu, Jieru
    Lin, Xiaoqi
    Zhou, Wen
    Liu, Yuxia
    Ou, Jianping
    Xing, Weijie
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [37] Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in Oocyte Donation Cycles
    Kontopoulos, George
    Simopoulou, Mara
    Zervomanolakis, Ioannis
    Prokopakis, Thomas
    Dimitropoulos, Kostas
    Dedoulis, Evaggelos
    Grigorakis, Stylianos
    Agapitou, Kristi
    Nikitos, Eros
    Rapani, Anna
    Vlahos, Nikos
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (06):
  • [38] Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles
    Kontopoulos, G.
    Psathas, P.
    Dimitropoulos, C.
    Vasilopoulos, I.
    Grigorakis, S.
    Mantzavinos, T.
    Dedoulis, E.
    Agapitou, K.
    Vlahos, N.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 249 - 250
  • [39] BLASTOCYST VERSUS CLEAVAGE-STAGE ELECTIVE SINGLE EMBRYO TRANSFER - A COMPARATIVE RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Veleva, Z.
    Boulet, S.
    Makinen, S.
    Martikainen, H.
    Tiitinen, A.
    Tapanainen, J.
    Kissin, D. M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E181 - E182
  • [40] Cumulative pregnancy rates after single cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer: a randomized and prospective study
    Brugnon, F.
    Bouraoui, Z.
    Ouchchane, L.
    Gremeau, A. S.
    Peikrishvili, R.
    Pouly, J. L.
    Janny, L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I60 - I61