Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for a novel fuzzy portfolio selection problem

被引:14
|
作者
Wang, Bo [1 ]
Watada, Junzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Grad Sch Informat Prod & Syst, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 8080135, Japan
关键词
multiobjective portfolio selection; risk measure methods; fuzzy value-at-risk; Pareto-optimal theory; multiobjective particle swarm optimization; algorithm comparisons; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/tee.21834
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
On the basis of the portfolio selection theory, this paper proposes a novel fuzzy multiobjective model that can evaluate investment risk properly and increase the probability of obtaining an expected return. In building this model, fuzzy value-at-risk (VaR) is used to evaluate the exact future risk in terms of loss. The VaR can directly reflect the greatest loss of a selection case under a given confidence level. Conversely, variance, the measure of the spread of a distribution around its expected value, is utilized to make the selection more stable. This model can provide investors with more significant information for decision making. To solve this model, an improved Pareto-optimal-set-based multiobjective particle swarm optimization (IMOPSO) algorithm is designed to obtain better solutions in the Pareto front. The proposed model and algorithm are exemplified by specific numerical examples. Furthermore, comparisons are made between IMOPSO and other existing approaches. Experiments show that the model and algorithm are effective in solving the multiobjective portfolio selection problem. (c) 2012 Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 154
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fuzzy Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization Solving the Three-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem
    Rangel-Gonzalez, Javier Alberto
    Fraire, Hector
    Solis, Juan Frausto
    Cruz-Reyes, Laura
    Gomez-Santillan, Claudia
    Rangel-Valdez, Nelson
    Carpio-Valadez, Juan Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 22 (08) : 2760 - 2768
  • [22] Fuzzy Gain Scheduling Design Based on Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization
    Costa, Edson B. M.
    Serra, Ginalber L. O.
    2015 LATIN AMERICA CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (LA-CCI), 2015,
  • [23] A Novel Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization Combining Hypercube and Distance
    Shu, Xiaoli
    Liu, Yanmin
    Zhang, Qian
    Yang, Meilan
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2022, 2022
  • [24] Two Stage Portfolio Selection and Optimization Model with the Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization
    Bin Zaheer, Kashif
    Bin Abd Aziz, Mohd Ismail
    Kashif, Amber Nehan
    Raza, Syed Muhammad Murshid
    MATEMATIKA, 2018, 34 (01) : 125 - 141
  • [25] An Entropy Driven Multiobjective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Feature Selection
    Luo, Juanjuan
    Zhou, Dongqing
    Jiang, Lingling
    Ma, Huadong
    2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, : 768 - 775
  • [26] The novel parameter selection of Particle swarm optimization
    Li, Zhuo
    Qu, Xueluo
    ADVANCED MECHANICAL DESIGN, PTS 1-3, 2012, 479-481 : 344 - +
  • [27] Multiobjective Optimization for Project Portfolio Selection
    Barros, Marcio de O.
    Costa, Helio R.
    Figueiredo, Fabio V.
    da Rocha, Ana Regina C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION COMPANION (GECCO'12), 2012, : 1541 - 1542
  • [28] A new particle swarm optimisation based on MATLAB for portfolio selection problem
    Gao J.
    Chu Z.
    International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2010, 9 (1-2) : 206 - 211
  • [29] Multiobjective Extremal Optimization for Portfolio Optimization Problem
    Chen, Min-Rong
    Weng, Jian
    Li, Xia
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, 2009, : 552 - +
  • [30] A united search particle swarm optimization algorithm for multiobjective scheduling problem
    Lian, Zhigang
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2010, 34 (11) : 3518 - 3526