CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage using a gravity-enhanced process

被引:39
|
作者
Li, Liwei [1 ]
Khorsandi, Saeid [1 ]
Johns, Russell T. [1 ]
Dilmore, Robert M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] US DOE, Natl Energy Technol Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
CO2; storage; Enhanced oil recovery (EOR); Heterogeneity; Horizontal wells; Gravity enhanced; Inspectional analysis; RELATIVE PERMEABILITY; SCREENING CRITERIA; CARBON CAPTURE; FLOW; SIMULATIONS; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.09.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CO2 flooding offers a means to recover significant amounts of oil while simultaneously sequestering CO2. Recent methods for CO2 geological storage have focused on CO2 injection into deep brine aquifers, or by water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection in a miscible gas flooding process using vertical wells. There is significant uncertainty in the amount of CO2 that can be stored using these methods owing to reservoir heterogeneity and variations in reservoir/fluid parameters. It would be useful therefore to have a more robust process that can also increase both CO2 storage and oil recovery in a symbiotic relationship, where increased storage leads to greater oil recovery. This paper considers an alternative process that maximizes both storage and oil recovery simultaneously using only horizontal wells in a gravity-enhanced miscible process. A reduced-order model (ROM) is developed to consider a wide range of reservoir heterogeneities and fluid properties. Monte-Carlo simulations using the ROM show that achieving very high storage and oil recovery is possible using the gravity-enhanced process and that the approach is very robust. For example, after 2.0 moveable pore volumes injected (MPVI), probabilistic forecasts show that CO2 storage efficiency across two standard deviations ranges from about 81% to 93%, indicating that nearly all of the available pore space (excluding immobile water) at the end of injection is occupied by CO2. Oil recoveries after 2.0 MPVI varied from 79% to 93% of the original mass of oil-in-place (OOIP). These storage and recovery efficiencies are significantly greater than any process reported to date. Response functions developed can also be used to estimate the maximum amount of stored CO2 and corresponding oil recoveries for a wide range of reservoir and fluid properties. Such estimates are critical for regional and national assessment of CO2 storage potential. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 515
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perspective of CO2 for Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Norwegian North Sea
    Pham, V
    Halland, E.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 7042 - 7046
  • [42] Opportunity and Challenges of Integrated Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 Flooding with Geological CO2 Storage in the Ordos Basin, China
    Jiao Zunsheng
    Zhou Lifa
    Gao Runmin
    Luo Tingting
    Hong, Wang
    Wang, Heng
    McLaughlin, Fred
    Bentley, Ramsey
    Quillinan, Scott
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 7761 - 7771
  • [43] CO2 Storage in Depleted Oil Fields: The Worldwide Potential for Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Godec, Michael
    Kuuskraa, Vello
    Van Leeuwen, Tyler
    Melzer, L. Stephen
    Wildgust, Neil
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 2162 - 2169
  • [44] LOOKING AT CO2 RECOVERY IN ENHANCED-OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS
    PRICE, BC
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1984, 82 (52) : 48 - 53
  • [45] A Laboratory and Numerical-Simulation Study of Co-Optimizing CO2 Storage and CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Kamali, Fatemeh
    Hussain, Furqan
    Cinar, Yildiray
    SPE JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (06): : 1227 - 1237
  • [46] Evaluation of CO2 Storage Mechanisms in CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites: Application to Morrow Sandstone Reservoir
    Arripomah, William
    Balch, Robert
    Cather, Martha
    Rose-Coss, Dylan
    Dai, Zhenxue
    Heath, Jason
    Dewers, Thomas
    Mozley, Peter
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (10) : 8545 - 8555
  • [47] Study of CO2 solubility enhancement by nanomaterials in carbonated water: Implications for enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage
    Sun, Xiaofei
    Ning, Haoyu
    Shi, Yuhao
    Yu, Guo
    Jia, Zixiong
    Han, Mingen
    Zhang, Yanyu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 396
  • [48] Quantifying CO2 storage efficiency factors in hydrocarbon reservoirs: A detailed look at CO2 enhanced oil recovery
    Peck, Wesley D.
    Azzolina, Nicholas A.
    Ge, Jun
    Bosshart, Nicholas W.
    Burton-Kelly, Matthew E.
    Gorecki, Charles D.
    Gorz, Andrew J.
    Ayash, Scott C.
    Nakles, David V.
    Melzer, L. Stephen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 69 : 41 - 51
  • [49] Best Practice for Transitioning from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR to CO2 Storage
    Allinson, Ken
    Burt, Dan
    Campbell, Lisa
    Constable, Lisa
    Crombie, Mark
    Lee, Arthur
    Lima, Vinicius
    Lloyd, Tim
    Solsbey, Lee
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 : 6950 - 6956
  • [50] An intelligent CO2-responsive hydrogel for applications in enhanced oil recovery and CO2 geological storage
    Fang, Pengwei
    Zhang, Qun
    Wu, Menqgi
    Zhou, Can
    Yang, Zhengming
    Yu, Hongwei
    Ji, Zemin
    Yi, Lina
    Jiang, Wen
    Chen, Xinliang
    Gao, Yuan
    Zhou, Mengfei
    Cao, Meiwen
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 359