Optimal voting schemes with costly information acquisition

被引:63
|
作者
Gershkov, Alex [2 ]
Szentes, Balazs [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Econ, Chicago, IL 60657 USA
[2] Univ Bonn, Dept Econ, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Information aggregation; Voting; CONDORCET JURY THEOREM; MECHANISM DESIGN; AGGREGATION; COMMITTEES; ELECTIONS; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jet.2008.02.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A group of individuals with identical preferences must make a decision under uncertainty about which decision is best. Before the decision is made, each agent can privately acquire a costly and imperfect signal. We discuss how to design a mechanism for eliciting and aggregating the collected information so as to maximize ex-ante social welfare. We first show that, of all mechanisms, a sequential one is optimal and works as follows. At random, one agent at a time is selected to acquire information and report the resulting signal. Agents are informed of neither their position in the sequence nor of other reports. Acquiring information when called upon and reporting truthfully is an equilibrium. We next characterize the ex-ante optimal scheme among all ex-post efficient mechanisms. In this mechanism, a decision is made when the precision of the posterior exceeds a cut-off that decreases with each additional report. The restriction to ex-post efficiency is shown to be without loss when the available signals are sufficiently imprecise. On the other hand, ex-post efficient mechanisms are shown to be suboptimal when the cost of information acquisition is sufficiently small. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 68
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Costly expressive voting
    Fishman, Arthur
    Klunover, Doron
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2024, 127 : 99 - 104
  • [32] Costly information acquisition. Is it better to toss a coin?
    Triossi, Matteo
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2013, 82 : 169 - 191
  • [33] Optimal disclosure of costly information packages in auctions
    Szech, Nora
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 47 (4-5) : 462 - 469
  • [34] Voting with endogenous information acquisition: Experimental evidence
    Bhattacharya, Sourav
    Duffy, John
    Kim, SunTak
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2017, 102 : 316 - 338
  • [35] Can compulsory voting reduce information acquisition?
    Rohde, Linnea Marie
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2024, 147 : 305 - 337
  • [36] Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model
    Gabaix, Xavier
    Laibson, David
    Moloche, Guillermo
    Weinberg, Stephen
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (04): : 1043 - 1068
  • [37] Costly information acquisition and public disclosure: implications for investor welfare
    Chen, Binbin
    Liu, Shancun
    Zhang, Qiang
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (11) : 880 - 885
  • [38] When costly voting is beneficial
    Chakravarty, Surajeet
    Kaplan, Todd R.
    Myles, Gareth
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2018, 167 : 33 - 42
  • [39] Costly Voting with Sequential Participation
    Kagifuku, Ryuya
    Matsubara, Shigeo
    AGENTS IN PRINCIPLE, AGENTS IN PRACTICE, 2011, 7047 : 68 - 82
  • [40] UNCERTAINTY, COSTLY INFORMATION AND THE OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
    PAPAKYRIAZIS, A
    KYBERNETES, 1987, 16 (02) : 91 - 98