Anaerobic co-composting of sugarbeet waste and wine factory wastes

被引:0
|
作者
Ipek, U [1 ]
Öbek, E [1 ]
Akça, L [1 ]
Arslan, EI [1 ]
Hasar, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Firat Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Environm Engn, TR-23119 Elazig, Turkey
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2001年 / 10卷 / 12期
关键词
anaerobic co-composting; sugarbeet waste; wine factory wastes; biological treatment sludge; faecal coliforms; total coliforms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The present research deals with evaluation of the efficiency of an anaerobic batch composting system to produce a product safe to use from a hygienic standpoint. So, using bacteriological parameters as a guideline, faecal coliforms (FC) and total coliforms (TC) on raw waste, leachates and finished compost were determined. Measurements also include total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), pH, conductivity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonium, total phosphorus (TP) and alkalinity in the leachate. Determinations on some metals, VS, cellulose, pH, conductivity, moisture, C, N, S, Ca, Mg, Na and K were carried out in the starting mixture and the compost obtained. The mixture of the composting materials was as follows: 70% wine factory wastes, 20% sugarbeet waste and 10% biological treatment sludge. By the end of the composting process (day 108), the TC and FC numbers in co-compost were reduced from 1609. 10(4) and 918. 10(4) MPN/g.ww to 0.33. 10(4) and 0.16.10(4) MPN/g.ww, respectively. Although FC and TC numbers were not completely eliminated in both leachate and compost at the end of the composting, their levels were very low. The fact that pathogen die-off is faster than that of the indicator organisms suggests that low numbers of indicator organisms are sign of elimination of pathogens.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 868
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Feasibility Study on Windrow Co-composting to Recycle Industrial Eggshell Waste
    Margarida J. Quina
    Micaela A. R. Soares
    Andreia A. Ribeiro
    Ana P. Marques
    Isabel H. Costa
    Maria C. Magalhães
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2014, 5 : 87 - 95
  • [42] Co-composting cow manure with food waste: The influence of lipids content
    Neves, L.
    Ferreira, V.
    Oliveira, R.
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 34 : 986 - 991
  • [43] Co-composting of Municipal Solid Waste with Sawdust: Improving Compost Quality
    Yousefi, Javad
    Younesi, Habibollah
    Ghasempoury, Seyed Mahmoud
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2013, 41 (02) : 185 - 194
  • [44] Advantages and drawbacks of OFMSW and winery waste co-composting at pilot scale
    Hungria, J.
    Gutierrez, M. C.
    Siles, J. A.
    Martin, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 1050 - 1057
  • [45] MANAGEMENT OF MACROALGAE FROM VENICE LAGOON THROUGH ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION AND CO-COMPOSTING WITH MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE (MSW)
    CECCHI, F
    VALLINI, G
    PAVAN, P
    BASSETTI, A
    MATAALVAREZ, J
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [46] THE NANTUCKET PATH TO CO-COMPOSTING
    不详
    BIOCYCLE, 1988, 29 (08) : 33 - 33
  • [47] CO-COMPOSTING OF REFUSE AND BARK
    DEVLEESCHAUWER, D
    VERDONCK, O
    DEBOODT, M
    RESOURCE RECOVERY AND CONSERVATION, 1980, 5 (03): : 285 - 291
  • [48] Succession of Microbial Community during the Co-Composting of Food Waste Digestate and Garden Waste
    Wang, Xiaohan
    He, Xiaoli
    Liang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (16)
  • [49] Effect of Biochar Amendments on the Co-Composting of Food Waste and Livestock Manure
    Chung, Woojin
    Shim, Jaehong
    Chang, Soon Woong
    Ravindran, Balasubramani
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [50] Co-composting of Beef Cattle Feedlot Manure with Construction and Demolition Waste
    Hao, Xiying
    Hill, Brett
    Caffyn, Pam
    Travis, Greg
    Olson, Andrew F.
    Larney, Francis J.
    McAllister, Tim
    Alexander, Trevor
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (05) : 1799 - 1808