Impact of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Types on Environmental Investment Decision-Making

被引:18
|
作者
Jassem, Suaad [1 ]
Azmi, Anna [1 ]
Zakaria, Zarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Business & Accountancy, Dept Accounting, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
sustainability balanced scorecard; experimental method; environmental investment decision-making; eco-efficiency knowledge; sustainability balanced scorecard knowledge; ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS; ACCOUNTING INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PERSPECTIVE; FRAMEWORK; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su10020541
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Investment decision-making based on aspects of sustainability is gaining importance among organizations around the globe. In this context, there is a need for quality investment decisions, which require sufficient knowledge among organizational managers about managing sustainability information to achieve environmental objectives that meet stakeholder expectations. This has led to the emergence of organizational performance measuring tools such as the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, which integrates the environmental perspective into the traditional Balanced Scorecard. Using experimental research method, the objective of this study is to investigate the indirect effect of Eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge as mediators influencing the relationship between Sustainability Balanced Scorecard types and their impact on environmental investment decision-making. Findings of the current research are based on 60 respondents who were randomly assigned to one of the following two types of Sustainability Balanced Scorecard architecture: (1) environmental data embedded within the traditional Balanced Scorecard perspectives; and (2) standalone environmental data as an additional fifth perspective along with the traditional Balanced Scorecard architecture. The traditional Balanced Scorecard without any information on environmental perspective is included in the experiment as the control condition. The findings indicate that the combined effect of eco-efficiency knowledge and Sustainability Balanced Scorecard knowledge has a significant positive influence on the relationship between the Balanced Scorecard type versus Sustainability Balanced Scorecard type and environmental investment decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Navigating Sustainability: A Bibliometric Exploration of Environmental Decision-Making and Behavioral Shifts
    Craciun, Maria Alexandra
    Domenteanu, Adrian
    Dudian, Monica
    Delcea, Camelia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [32] The Impact of Behavioural Finance on Investment Decision-making: A Study of Selected Investment Banks in Nigeria
    Ogunlusi, Olubunmi Edward
    Obademi, Olalekan
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 22 (06) : 1345 - 1361
  • [33] Default rules in investment decision-making: trait anxiety and decision-making styles
    Gambetti, Elisa
    Zucchelli, Micaela Maria
    Nori, Raffaella
    Giusberti, Fiorella
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [34] Default rules in investment decision-making: trait anxiety and decision-making styles
    Elisa Gambetti
    Micaela Maria Zucchelli
    Raffaella Nori
    Fiorella Giusberti
    Financial Innovation, 8
  • [35] A case study in strategic decision making using multi-criteria decision making and balanced scorecard
    Ajripour I.
    Molnar V.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2022, 15 (05): : 578 - 603
  • [36] Sustainable technology selection decision-making model for enterprise in supply chain: Based on a modified strategic balanced scorecard
    Xia, De
    Yu, Qian
    Gao, Qinglu
    Cheng, Guoping
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 : 1337 - 1348
  • [37] The uncertainty decision-making of ERP investment
    Wu, Feng
    Li, Huaizu
    Chu, Lk
    Gao, Kun
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICAL ISSUES OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS II, VOL 1, 2008, 254 : 85 - +
  • [38] Emotions and financial investment decision-making
    Wranik, Tanja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 423 - 423
  • [39] CYBERNETIC APPROACH TO INVESTMENT DECISION-MAKING
    FELSEN, J
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1978, 6 (03): : 237 - 247
  • [40] Personality differences and investment decision-making
    Jiang, Zhengyang
    Peng, Cameron
    Yan, Hongjun
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 153