Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities in Chinese Population: Practice and Lessons in Pudong New Area of Shanghai, China

被引:27
|
作者
Wu, Wei-miao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yingying [2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Hui-ru [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Chen [2 ,3 ]
Li, Xiao-qiang [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Bei [2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Yi [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Wang-hong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Tao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Natl Hlth Commiss Peoples Republ China, Sch Publ Hlth, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Pudong Inst Prevent Med, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Pudong New Area Shanghai, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2019年 / 9卷
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; risk assessment; risk score; fecal immunochemical tests; RISK-FACTORS; ADVANCED NEOPLASIA; INTERVAL CANCERS; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; PROGRAM; ASIA;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2019.00399
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Parallel test of risk stratification and two-sample qualitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used to screen colorectal cancer (CRC) in Shanghai, China. This study was designed to identify an optimal initial screening modality based on available data. Methods: A total of 538,278 eligible residents participated in the program during the period of January 2013 to June 2017. Incident CRC was collected through program reporting system and by record linkage with the Shanghai Cancer Registry up to December 2017. Logistic regression model was applied to identify significant factors to calculate risk score for CRC. Cutoff points of risk score were determined based on Youden index and defined specificity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) were computed to evaluate validity of assumed screening modalities. Results: A total of 446 CRC were screen-detected, and 777 interval or missed cases were identified through record linkage. The risk score system had an optimal cutoff point of 19 and performed better in detecting CRC and predicting long-term CRC risk than did the risk stratification. When using a cutoff point of 24, parallel test of risk score, and FIT were expected to avoid 56 interval CRCs with minimal decrease in PPV and increase in colonoscopy. However, the observed detection rates were much lower than those expected due to low compliance to colonoscopy. Conclusions: Risk score is superior to risk stratification used in the program, particularly when combined with FIT. Compliance to colonoscopy should be improved to guarantee the effectiveness of CRC screening in the population.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities Among the General Population in Saudi Arabia
    Alharbi, Mohammad
    AlSaleem, Lena S.
    Alrashid, Maha H.
    Alutaibi, Halal
    Alabdrabulrida, Shahad A.
    Mahjari, Ahood A.
    AlZahrani, Rahaf
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [22] The integration of IT governance practice research on the CIO perspective Taking Shanghai Pudong New area IT Audit Information System Project For an example
    Wei, Zhong
    Song, Qing-fei
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 5204 - +
  • [23] Population-based screening for colorectal cancer in Wuhan, China
    Liu, Song
    Wang, Yifan
    Wang, Yuying
    Duan, Chaofan
    Liu, Fan
    Zhang, Heng
    Tian, Xia
    Ding, Xiangwu
    Zhang, Manling
    Cao, Dan
    Liu, Yi
    Jiang, Ruijingfang
    Zhuo, Duan
    Peng, Jiaxi
    Zhu, Shida
    Zhao, Lijian
    Wang, Jian
    Wei, Li
    Shi, Zhaohong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [24] Prospects for population colorectal cancer screening in New Zealand
    Parry, Susan
    Richardson, Ann
    Green, Terri
    Marshall, Betsy
    Bissett, Ian
    Bloomfield, Ashley
    Chadwick, Vinton
    Cunningham, Chris
    Findlay, Michael
    Greer, Barbara
    McMenamin, John
    Strid, Judi
    Robertson, Greg
    Teague, Clinton
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 120 (1258) : 44 - 56
  • [25] Recommendations on population screening for colorectal cancer in New Zealand
    Parry, S
    Richardson, A
    Marshall, B
    McCall, J
    Bagshaw, P
    Chadwick, V
    Cunningham, C
    Green, T
    Griffiths, R
    Heap, S
    Strid, J
    Teague, C
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 112 (1080) : 4 - 6
  • [26] CURRENT PRACTICE PATTERNS OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT MODALITIES IN THE ELDERLY POPULATION WITH COLORECTAL CANCER.
    Akhtar, A.
    Bernescu, I.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E376 - E377
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
    Wang, Jie
    de Jonge, Lucie
    Cenin, Dayna R.
    Li, Pei
    Tao, Sha
    Yang, Chen
    Yan, Bei
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 29
  • [28] CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF A COLORECTAL CANCER RISK PREDICTION MODEL IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING POPULATION OF CHINA
    Guo, Lanwei
    Zheng, Liyang
    Chen, Qiong
    Zhang, Shaokai
    GUT, 2022, 71 : A114 - A114
  • [29] COST-EFFECTIVENESS SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN SHANGHAI POPULATION, CHINA: COMPARISON BETWEEN URBAN AND RURAL RESIDENTS
    Dou, G.
    Li, X.
    Ying, X.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S39 - S39
  • [30] Cancer screening beliefs and reactions to an innovative colorectal cancer screening kit among Chinese worksite population
    Hou, S
    Chen, P
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2005, 44 (02) : 315 - 318