Development and validation of a measure of health literacy in the UK: the newest vital sign

被引:84
|
作者
Rowlands, Gill [1 ]
Khazaezadeh, Nina [2 ]
Oteng-Ntim, Eugene [2 ]
Seed, Paul [3 ]
Barr, Suzanne [3 ]
Weiss, Barry D. [4 ]
机构
[1] London S Bank Univ, London, England
[2] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, London WC2R 2LS, England
[4] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Literacy; Health literacy; Nutrition label; Measure; KNOWLEDGE; INSTRUMENT; DELPHI; ADULTS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-13-116
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Health literacy (HL) is an important public health issue. Current measures have drawbacks in length and/ or acceptability. The US-developed Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy instrument measures both reading comprehension and numeracy skills using a nutrition label, takes 3 minutes to administer, and has proven to be acceptable to research subjects. This study aimed to amend and validate it for the UK population. Methods: We used a three-stage process; (1) a Delphi study with academic and clinical experts to amend the NVS label to reflect UK nutrition labeling (2) community-based cognitive testing to assess and improve ease of understanding and acceptability of the test (3) validation of the NVS-UK against an accepted standard test of health literacy, the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) (Pearson's r and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve) and participant educational level. A sample size calculation indicated that 250 participants would be required. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years and ability to converse in English. We excluded people working in the health field and those with impaired vision or inability to undertake the interview due to cognitive impairment or inability to converse in English. Results: In the Delphi study, 28 experts reached consensus (3 cycles). Cognitive testing (80 participants) yielded an instrument that needed no further refinement. Validation testing (337 participants) showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.74). Validation against the TOFHLA demonstrated a Pearson's r of 0.49 and an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. Conclusions: The NVS-UK is a valid measure of HL. Its acceptability and ease of application makes it an ideal tool for use in the UK. It has potential uses in public health research including epidemiological surveys and randomized controlled trials, and in enabling practitioners to tailor care to patient need.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Brief Health Literacy Screening Items Predict Newest Vital Sign Scores
    Stagliano, Vanessa
    Wallace, Lorraine S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (05) : 558 - 565
  • [22] Can the Newest Vital Sign Be Used to Assess Health Literacy in Children and Adolescents?
    Warsh, Joel
    Chari, Roopa
    Badaczewski, Adam
    Hossain, Jobayer
    Sharif, Iman
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2014, 53 (02) : 141 - 144
  • [23] Newest vital sign: How well does it screen for low health literacy?
    Rodrigue, C. Z.
    Bass, P. F.
    Osborn, C. Y.
    Wolf, M. S.
    Davis, K.
    Bocchini, M.
    Jain, S.
    Davis, T. C.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 55 (01) : S301 - S301
  • [24] Self-Administered Assessment of Health Literacy in Adolescents Using the Newest Vital Sign
    Linnebur, Lauren A.
    Linnebur, Sunny A.
    HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2018, 19 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [25] The Use of the Newest Vital Sign Health Literacy Instrument in Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease
    Caldwell, Elizabeth Perry
    Carter, Patricia
    Becker, Heather
    Mackert, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 35 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [26] Health Literacy Instrument in Family Medicine: The "Newest Vital Sign" Ease of Use and Correlates
    Shah, Lisa Ciccarelli
    West, Patricia
    Bremmeyr, Katazryna
    Savoy-Moore, Ruth T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [27] Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign
    Weiss, BD
    Mays, MZ
    Martz, W
    Castro, KM
    DeWalt, DA
    Pignone, MP
    Mockbee, J
    Hale, FA
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2005, 3 (06) : 514 - 522
  • [28] Revisiting the Newest Vital Sign Survey: Addressing Concerns About This Health Literacy Assessment Tool
    Schol, Jordy
    Ambrosio, Luca
    Yamada, Yoshiyuki
    Sakai, Daisuke
    HLRP-HEALTH LITERACY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 8 (02) : e91 - e92
  • [29] Measuring Health Literacy in Caregivers of Children: A Comparison of the Newest Vital Sign and S-TOFHLA
    Morrison, Andrea K.
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Hoffmann, Raymond G.
    Brousseau, David C.
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2014, 53 (13) : 1264 - 1270
  • [30] Utility of the Newest Vital Sign to assess health literacy in community-dwelling older adults
    Salgado, T. M.
    Ramos, S. B.
    Clesia, S.
    Canas, R.
    Cunha, I.
    Benrimoj, S. I.
    Fernandez-Llimos, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2013, 35 (05) : 984 - 984