Non-destructive examination of the bonding interface in DEMO divertor fingers

被引:3
|
作者
Richou, Marianne [1 ]
Missirlian, Marc [1 ]
Vignal, Nicolas [1 ]
Cantone, Vincent [1 ]
Hernandez, Caroline [1 ]
Norajitra, Prachai [2 ]
Spatafora, Luigi [2 ]
机构
[1] CEA, IRFM, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Appl Mat Mat Proc Technol IAM WPT, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Plasma facing components; DEMO; Divertor; Non-destructive examination;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.071
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Plasma facing components (PFCs) with tungsten (W) armor materials for DEMO divertor require a high heat flux removal capability (at least 10 MW/m2 in steady-state conditions). The reference divertor PFC concept is a finger with a tungsten tile as a protection and sacrificial layer brazed to a thimble made of tungsten alloy W - 1% La(2)o(3) (WL10). Defects may be located at the W thimble to W tile interface. As the number of fingers is considerable (>250,000), it is then a major issue to develop a reliable control procedure in order to control with a non-destructive examination the fabrication processes. The feasibility for detecting defect with infrared thermography SATIR test bed is presented. SATIR is based on the heat transient method and is used as an inspection tool in order to assess component heat transfer capability. SATIR tests were performed on fingers integrating or not the complex He cooling system (steel cartridge with jet holes). Millimeter size artificial defects were manufactured and their detectability was evaluated. Results of this study demonstrate that the SATIR method can be considered as a relevant non-destructive technique examination for the defect detection of DEMO divertor fingers. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1757
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-destructive testing of CFC monoblock divertor mock-ups
    Ezato, K
    Dairaku, M
    Taniguchi, M
    Sato, K
    Akiba, M
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 2002, 307 (1 SUPPL.) : 144 - 148
  • [22] Non-destructive testing and inspection for welds and bonding joints
    Yoshikazu, Yokono
    Yosetsu Gakkai Shi/Journal of the Japan Welding Society, 2009, 78 (03): : 37 - 47
  • [23] Destructive and non-destructive evaluation of cu/cu diffusion bonding with interlayer aluminum
    Kumar, Santosh A.
    Mohan, T.
    Kumar, Suresh S.
    Ravisankar, B.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT ADVANCES IN MATERIALS, MECHANICAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 330
  • [24] USE OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION IN WELDING INSPECTION.
    Frost-Drury, M.L.
    Non-Destructive Testing - Australia, 1979, 16 (03): : 17 - 19
  • [25] Applicability of Non-Destructive Examination to Iter TF Joints
    March, Stephen
    Bruzzone, Pierluigi
    Hamada, Kazuya
    Foussat, Arnaud
    Bonito-Oliva, Alessandro
    Cornelis, Marc
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2015, 25 (03)
  • [27] COMPARISON OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES FOR CRACK INSPECTION
    Aulin, Axel
    Shahzad, Khurram
    MacKenzie, Robert
    Bott, Steven
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE (IPC2020), VOL 1, 2020,
  • [28] PROGRESS IN NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION OF CERAMIC CHIP CAPACITORS
    COOK, JL
    EWELL, GJ
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1980, 59 (08): : 831 - 831
  • [29] NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION RADIOLOGICAL TRAINING FOR PLANT PERSONNEL
    GUTWEIN, EE
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1985, 49 (01): : 165 - 165
  • [30] CONFERENCE REPORT - NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY
    NICHOLS, RW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING, 1988, 30 (04): : 277 - 279