Enrolment procedures and self-selection by patients: evidence from a Polish family practice

被引:3
|
作者
Chawla, M [1 ]
Tomasik, T
Kulis, M
Windak, A
Rogers, DA
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat & Int Hlth, Int Hlth Syst Grp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Hlth Serv, Krakow, Poland
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Family Med, Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland
[4] Harvard Jagiellonian Consortium Hlth, Krakow, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1093/heapol/14.3.285
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines the consequences of patient enrolment procedures in a capitation-based family practice in Krakow (Poland), where the local city government used two different methods for preparation of patient lists. In the first, the city gave the individuals living within the practice area the option of withdrawing from being enrolled in the practice; in the second, individuals were given the option of enrolling in the practice. These two enrolment procedures, identified as 'active-negative' and 'active-positive' respectively, provide a natural experiment for investigating the effects of an enrolment methodology on the economics of a physician's practice. An examination of the data indicates that self-selecting enrolees utilize significantly greater quantities of health care compared to others, and university educated individuals and individuals more likely to fall ill are more likely to self-select into a practice. The study suggests that in order to reduce demand-side adverse selection, either the system of active-positive enrolment should be modified, or capitation rates should be risk-adjusted by health status rather than by demographic variables only. The policy implications of this study become even more significant as more and more physicians leave their salaried jobs to start state-financed independent practice.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 290
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: Evidence from Indian data
    Crost, Benjamin
    Shankar, Bhavani
    Bennett, Richard
    Morse, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 58 (01) : 24 - 36
  • [42] Pro-social preferences and self-selection into the public health sector: evidence from an economic experiment
    Kolstad, Julie Riise
    Lindkvist, Ida
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2013, 28 (03) : 320 - 327
  • [43] Occupational self-selection of European emigrants: Evidence from nineteenth-century Hesse-Cassel
    Wegge, Simone A.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 2002, 6 : 365 - 394
  • [44] Self-selection into export markets by business services firms - Evidence from France, Germany and the United Kingdom
    Temouri, Yama
    Vogel, Alexander
    Wagner, Joachim
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 25 : 146 - 158
  • [45] Self-Selection and Learning by Exporting from Indian Manufacturing Firms
    Kumar, Manoj
    Raman, Jyoti
    Singh, Priya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASIAN BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 6 (04) : 27 - 43
  • [46] When, and why, do teams benefit from self-selection?
    Mira Fischer
    Rainer Michael Rilke
    B. Burcin Yurtoglu
    Experimental Economics, 2023, 26 : 749 - 774
  • [47] When, and why, do teams benefit from self-selection?
    Fischer, Mira
    Rilke, Rainer Michael
    Yurtoglu, B. Burcin
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (04) : 749 - 774
  • [48] A Research on Corporate Productivity and Exporting from the Perspective of Self-selection
    Yi Jingtao
    Fu Jiasha
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH EURO-ASIA CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND CSR: TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SESSION, PT III, 2010, : 72 - +
  • [49] SELF-SELECTION OF EMIGRANTS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE ON STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE IN OBSERVABLE AND UNOBSERVABLE CHARACTERISTICS
    Borjas, George J.
    Kauppinen, Ilpo
    Poutvaara, Panu
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2019, 129 (617): : 143 - 171
  • [50] Family networks and school enrolment: Evidence from a randomized social experiment
    Angelucci, Manuela
    De Giorgi, Giacomo
    Rangel, Marcos A.
    Rasul, Imran
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2010, 94 (3-4) : 197 - 221