An adaptive response surface method for continuous Bayesian model calibration

被引:0
|
作者
Sarkarfarshi, Mirhamed [1 ]
Gracie, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Bayesian; Adaptive; Calibration; Parameter estimation; Response surface; METAMODELING TECHNIQUES; GEOLOGICAL MEDIA; CO2; STORAGE; SEQUESTRATION; FRAMEWORK; OPTIMIZATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-016-1231-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-linear numerical models of the injection phase of a carbon sequestration (CS) project are computationally demanding. Thus, the computational cost of the calibration of these models using sampling- based solutions can be formidable. The Bayesian adaptive response surface method (BARSM)-an adaptive response surface method (RSM)-is developed to mitigate the cost of samplingbased, continuous calibration of CS models. It is demonstrated that the adaptive scheme has a negligible effect on accuracy, while providing a significant increase in efficiency. In the BARSM, a meta-model replaces the computationally costly full model during the majority of the calibration cycles. In the remaining cycles, the full model is used and samples of these cycles are utilized for adaptively updating the meta-model. The idea behind the BARSM is to take advantage of the fact that samplingbased calibration algorithms typically tend to sample more frequently from areas with a larger posterior density than from areas with a smaller posterior density. This behavior of the sampling-based calibration algorithms is used to adaptively update the meta-model and to make it more accurate where it is most likely to be evaluated. The BARSM is integrated with Unscented Importance Sampling (UIS) (Sarkarfarshi and Gracie, Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 29: 975-993, 2015), which is an efficient Bayesian calibration algorithm. A synthesized case of supercritical CO2 injection in a heterogeneous saline aquifer is used to assess the performance of the BARSM and to compare it with a classical non-adaptive RSM approach and Bayesian calibration method UIS without using RSM. The BARSM is shown to reduce the computational cost compared to non-adaptive Bayesian calibration by 87 %, with negligible effect on accuracy. It is demonstrated that the error of the meta-model fitted using the BARSM, when samples are drawn from the posterior parameter distribution, is negligible and smaller than the monitoring error.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 741
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A generalized Bayesian approach to model calibration
    Tohme, Tony
    Vanslette, Kevin
    Youcef-Toumi, Kamal
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 204
  • [32] Bayesian model calibration of submarine landslides
    Varela, Patricia
    Medina-Cetina, Zenon
    Hernawan, Billy
    LANDSLIDES, 2025,
  • [33] Bayesian Calibration of the Intelligent Driver Model
    Zhang, Chengyuan
    Sun, Lijun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 25 (08) : 9308 - 9320
  • [34] A generalisation of the method of regression calibration and comparison with Bayesian and frequentist model averaging methods
    Little, Mark P.
    Hamada, Nobuyuki
    Zablotska, Lydia B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [35] BAYESIAN MODEL FOR CALIBRATION OF ILI TOOLS
    Al-Amin, M.
    Zhou, W.
    Zhang, S.
    Kariyawasam, S.
    Wang, H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2012, VOL 2, 2013, : 201 - 208
  • [36] Model calibration: A hierarchical Bayesian approach
    Bozorgzadeh, Nezam
    Liu, Zhongqiang
    Nadim, Farrokh
    Lacasse, Suzanne
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2023, 71
  • [37] Calibration of Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman Model Parameters of a NiTi Alloy Using Response Surface Method
    Voyiadjis, George Z.
    Bahrami, Hossein
    Hoseini, S. H.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2023, 32 (18) : 8467 - 8477
  • [38] Bayesian Model Selection Framework to Improve Calibration of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for Diabetes Management
    Acciaroli, G.
    Vettoretti, M.
    Facchinetti, A.
    Sparacino, G.
    2018 40TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2018, : 29 - 32
  • [39] A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis
    Roussouly, N.
    Petitjean, F.
    Salaun, M.
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2013, 32 : 103 - 115
  • [40] Adaptive importance sampling method with response surface technique
    Kim, SH
    Ra, KW
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 877 - 882