Cost-effectiveness of provider-based HIV partner notification in urban Malawi

被引:44
|
作者
Rutstein, Sarah E. [1 ]
Brown, Lillian B. [2 ,3 ]
Biddle, Andrea K. [1 ]
Wheeler, Stephanie B. [1 ]
Kamanga, Gift [4 ]
Mmodzi, Pearson [4 ]
Nyirenda, Naomi [4 ]
Mofolo, Innocent [4 ]
Rosenberg, Nora E. [2 ]
Hoffman, Irving F. [3 ]
Miller, William C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Div Infect Dis, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] UNC Project, Lilongwe, Malawi
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; contact tracing; HIV; sub-Saharan Africa; HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; HETEROSEXUAL TRANSMISSION; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; DISCORDANT COUPLES; REFERRAL SERVICES; RISK BEHAVIORS; COITAL-ACT; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1093/heapol/czs140
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Provider-initiated partner notification for HIV effectively identifies new cases of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, but is not widely implemented. Our objective was to determine whether provider-based HIV partner notification strategies are cost-effective for preventing HIV transmission compared with passive referral. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-analytic model from the health system perspective during a 1-year period. Costs and outcomes of all strategies were estimated with a decision-tree model. The study setting was an urban sexually transmitted infection clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi, using a hypothetical cohort of 5000 sex partners of 3500 HIV-positive index cases. We evaluated three partner notification strategies: provider notification (provider attempts to notify indexes' locatable partners), contract notification (index given 1 week to notify partners then provider attempts notification) and passive referral (index is encouraged to notify partners, standard of care). Our main outcomes included cost (US dollars) per transmission averted, cost per new case identified and cost per partner tested. Based on estimated transmissions in a 5000-person cohort, provider and contract notification averted 27.9 and 27.5 new infections, respectively, compared with passive referral. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $3560 per HIV transmission averted for contract notification compared with passive referral. Provider notification was more expensive and slightly more effective than contract notification, yielding an ICER of $51 421 per transmission averted. ICERs were sensitive to the proportion of partners not contacted, but likely HIV positive and the probability of transmission if not on antiretroviral therapy. The costs per new case identified were $36 (provider), $18 (contract) and $8 (passive). The costs per partner tested were $19 (provider), $9 (contract) and $4 (passive). We conclude that, in this population, provider-based notification strategies are potentially cost-effective for identifying new cases of HIV. These strategies offer a simple, effective and easily implementable opportunity to control HIV transmission.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 126
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of CHOP in treating DLBCL in Malawi.
    Painschab, Matthew
    Kohler, Racquel Elizabeth
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Gopal, Satish
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [22] Comparative cost-effectiveness of Option BR for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Malawi
    Tweya, Hannock
    Keiser, Olivia
    Haas, Andreas D.
    Tenthani, Lyson
    Phiri, Sam
    Egger, Matthias
    Estill, Janne
    AIDS, 2016, 30 (06) : 953 - 961
  • [23] Perspectives on HIV partner notification, partner HIV self-testing and partner home-based HIV testing by pregnant and postpartum women in antenatal settings: a qualitative analysis in Malawi and Zambia
    Hershow, Rebecca B.
    Zimba, Chifundo C.
    Mweemba, Oliver
    Chibwe, Kasapo F.
    Phanga, Twambilile
    Dunda, Wezzie
    Matenga, Tulani
    Mutale, Wilbroad
    Chi, Benjamin H.
    Rosenberg, Nora E.
    Maman, Suzanne
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2019, 22
  • [24] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Option B plus for HIV Prevention and Treatment of Mothers and Children in Malawi
    Fasawe, Olufunke
    Avila, Carlos
    Shaffer, Nathan
    Schouten, Erik
    Chimbwandira, Frank
    Hoos, David
    Nakakeeto, Olive
    De Lay, Paul
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [25] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PARTNER NOTIFICATION IN DIAGNOSING EARLY HIV INFECTION IN PLYMOUTH, UK
    Warwick, Z.
    Wimpenny, T.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2012, 88 : A19 - A19
  • [26] A controlled study of the effectiveness of public health HIV partner notification services
    Golden, Matthew R.
    Dombrowski, Julia C.
    Wood, Robert W.
    Fleming, Mark
    Harrington, Robert D.
    AIDS, 2009, 23 (01) : 133 - 135
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV - Reply
    Sanders, GD
    Bayoumi, AM
    Owens, DK
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (20): : 2138 - 2138
  • [28] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF MARAVIROC FOR HIV IN MEXICO
    Contreras-Hernandez, I
    Becker, D. L.
    Chancellor, J., V
    Kuehne, F.
    Mould-Quevedo, J.
    Marfatia, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) : A116 - A116
  • [29] Modeling and Cost-Effectiveness in HIV Prevention
    Margo M. Jacobsen
    Rochelle P. Walensky
    Current HIV/AIDS Reports, 2016, 13 : 64 - 75
  • [30] The cost-effectiveness of DOTS in urban brazil
    Mohan, C. I.
    Bishai, D.
    Cavalcante, S.
    Chaisson, R. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2007, 11 (01) : 27 - 32