Repurposing the power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter as a tunnelled, non-cuffed, centrally inserted central venous catheter in oncological patients for short- to mid-term vascular access: A pilot study

被引:3
|
作者
Low, Xi Zhen [1 ]
Tay, Kiang Hiong [1 ]
Leong, Sum [1 ]
Lo, Richard Hoau Gong [1 ]
Zhuang, Kun Da [1 ]
Chua, Jasmine Ming Er [1 ]
Too, Chow Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, SingHlth Duke NUS Acad Med Ctr, Dept Vasc & Intervent Radiol, Div Radiol Sci,Radiol Sci Acad Clin Programme, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
来源
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS | 2021年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词
Oncology; central venous catheter; peripherally inserted central catheter; novel technique; INFANTS; PICC;
D O I
10.1177/1129729820943449
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objectives: Usual short- to mid-term vascular accesses for oncologic patients include the peripherally inserted central catheter and non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters, inserted in the supraclavicular or infraclavicular area. Peripherally inserted central catheters can be restrictive in active patients; supraclavicular non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters are not ideal in terms of exit site location and cosmesis, while infraclavicular non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters may be associated with puncture-related complications. In this pilot study, we have evaluated the off-label use of peripherally inserted central catheters as a tunnelled supraclavicular centrally inserted central catheter. Methods: Ten patients were recruited for this prospective study. A non-cuffed, power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter was inserted via a short subcutaneous tunnel into the internal jugular vein using the peel-away sheath and introducer as a tunneller. Puncture wounds were closed with tissue glue. Patients were followed up for comfort scores, dwell time and complications. Results: The median dwell time was 94 days (mean of 113 days). One catheter was removed due to systemic fungemia, resulting in an acceptable complication rate of 0.97 per 1000 catheter days.Mean patient-reported comfort scores was 16 (out of 20). Pressurised injections for computer tomography imaging were performed in five patients without complications. Conclusion: Despite limited numbers, this method appears to be safe and well accepted with low complication rates. This modified vascular access is low profile, easily concealed, readily removable and compatible with pressure injector and uses a commonly found catheter in a modified fashion. Larger prospective trials will be needed to ascertain if it can be a standard of care for oncological patients.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 461
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patterns and Predictors of Short-Term Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
    Paje, David
    Conlon, Anna
    Kaatz, Scott
    Swaminathan, Lakshmi
    Boldenow, Tanya
    Bernstein, Steven J.
    Flanders, Scott A.
    Chopra, Vineet
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 13 (02) : 76 - 82
  • [22] Incidence of Catheter-Related Venous Thromboembolism Events in Acute Leukemia patients; A Comparative, Retrospective Study of the Safety of Peripherally-Inserted Vs Centrally-Inserted Central Venous Catheters
    Refaei, Mohammad
    Fernandes, Bruna
    Brandwein, Joseph
    Goodyear, M. Dawn
    Wu, Cynthia M.
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [23] Deep Vein Thrombosis And Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Are Uncommon Following Peripherally-Inserted Central Catheter And Short-Term Central Venous Catheter Placement In The Medical Icu
    Nolan, M. E.
    Yadav, H.
    Cartin-Ceba, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 189
  • [24] Catheter-related sepsis in ultrasound-guided percutaneously inserted long-term tunnelled central venous catheter: A review of 50 patients
    Li, Wing-Hong
    Tsang, Shiu-Hei
    Tsao, Joanne Pui-Yue
    Tong, Wai-Chung
    Tang, Lap-Fai
    SURGICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 9 (02) : 41 - 45
  • [25] A peripherally inserted central catheter line, inserted the day before surgery, decreases the time from induction to incision for spinal deformity surgery and safely provides central venous access during surgery: a pilot study
    Stuedemann, Anne E.
    Schwend, Richard M.
    Thomas, Valorie K.
    Leamon, Julia M.
    Lightner, Tammy S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2018, 27 (02): : 176 - 179
  • [26] Incidence of catheter-related venous thromboembolism events in acute leukemia patients; a retrospective study of the safety of peripherally-inserted central catheter
    Refaei, M.
    Fernandes, B.
    Brandwein, J.
    Wu, C.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2015, 13 : 721 - 721
  • [27] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Tang, Tian-tian
    Liu, Lei
    Li, Chun-xiao
    Li, Yun-tao
    Zhou, Tao
    Li, Hai-ping
    Wang, Jianxin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (09) : 2245 - 2249
  • [28] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Adriana Toro
    Elena Schembari
    Edoardo Mattone
    Isidoro Di Carlo
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1004 - 1005
  • [29] Which is Better for Patients with Breast Cancer: Totally Implanted Vascular Access Devices (TIVAD) or Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)?
    Toro, Adriana
    Schembari, Elena
    Mattone, Edoardo
    Di Carlo, Isidoro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (03) : 1004 - 1005
  • [30] Prevalence and predictors of peripherally inserted central venous catheter associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients A multicentre cohort study
    Lee, Jae Hwan
    Kim, Min Uk
    Kim, Eung Tae
    Shim, Dong Jae
    Kim, Il Jung
    Byeon, Jong Hyun
    Kim, Hyun Beom
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (06)