A Comparison of Engine Emissions from Heavy, Medium, and Light Vehicles for CNG, Diesel, and Gasoline Fuels

被引:0
|
作者
Yasar, Abdullah [1 ]
Haider, Rizwan [1 ]
Tabinda, Amtul Bari [1 ]
Kausar, Fidous [1 ]
Khan, Maryam [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Coll Univ, Sustainable Dev Study Ctr, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES | 2013年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
alternative fuels; vehicular emissions; diesel vehicles; air quality; fuel and engine types; GAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Like other developing countries (Brazil, Argentina, and India) compressed natural gas (CNG) is becoming a popular vehicular fuel in Pakistan. Rapid shifting of diesel and gasoline vehicles to CNG has brought Pakistan the highest number of CNG vehicles in the world. To quantify a possible decrease in vehicular emissions for different types of vehicles, engine and fuel types were monitored for five parameters: SO2, CO, NO, hydrocarbons, and smoke opacity. Emissions from heavy vehicle engines shifting from diesel to CNG showed a decrease in HC (14 times), NO (2.8 times), and smoke opacity (3.2 times), while shifting diesel car engines to CNG resulted in reduced emissions of HC (24.6 times), NO (2.8 times), and smoke opacity (6 times). However, switching of light vehicles such as gasoline car engines to CNG released low emissions of HC (4.6 times), smoke opacity (1.2 times), SO2 (1.2 times), and CO (1.1 times), but an increase in NO (1.2 times) was observed. Similarly, a 4-stroke CNG rickshaw engine increased NO emissions by 1.4 times over a 4-stroke gasoline rickshaw engine.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1281
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Gasoline Fumigation on Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions
    Ou, Lijun
    Wang, Chunmei
    Qian, Yejian
    Huang, Wei
    Zhu, Suwei
    Sun, Jun
    MECHANICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-5, 2012, 130-134 : 1744 - 1748
  • [32] Diesel engine performance and emissions with fuels derived from waste tyres
    Verma, Puneet
    Zare, Ali
    Jafari, Mohammad
    Bodisco, Timothy A.
    Rainey, Thomas
    Ristovski, Zoran D.
    Brown, Richard J.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [33] Regulated and unregulated emissions from a light-duty diesel engine with different sulfur content fuels
    Tan, Pi-Qiang
    Hu, Zhi-Yuan
    Lou, Di-Ming
    FUEL, 2009, 88 (06) : 1086 - 1091
  • [34] HOW DO DIESEL AND GASOLINE ENGINE EMISSIONS COMPARE?
    Anon
    Automotive Engineering International, 1977, 85 (11): : 50 - 55
  • [35] Quantifying On-Road Emissions from Gasoline-Powered Motor Vehicles: Accounting for the Presence of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks
    Dallmann, Timothy R.
    Kirchstetter, Thomas W.
    DeMartini, Steven J.
    Harley, Robert A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (23) : 13873 - 13881
  • [36] Black carbon emissions from light-duty passenger vehicles using ethanol blended gasoline fuels
    Zheng X.
    Wu X.
    He L.
    Guo X.
    Wu Y.
    Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2019, 19 (07): : 1645 - 1654
  • [37] Black Carbon Emissions from Light-duty Passenger Vehicles Using Ethanol Blended Gasoline Fuels
    Zheng, Xuan
    Wu, Xian
    He, Liqiang
    Guo, Xin
    Wu, Ye
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (07) : 1645 - 1654
  • [38] Performance and Emissions of Diesel and Alternative Diesel Fuels in a Heavy-duty Industry-Standard Older Engine
    Nikanjam, Manuch
    Rutherford, James
    Spreen, Kent
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUELS AND LUBRICANTS, 2010, 3 (02) : 1021 - 1029
  • [39] Benchmarking heavy-duty ethanol vehicles against diesel and CNG vehicles
    Nylund, Nils-Olof
    Laurikko, Juhani
    Laine, Petri
    Suominen, Jari
    Anttonen, Mika P. A.
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2013, 3 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [40] The strategies for reducing emissions from heavy duty diesel vehicles
    Samec, N
    Dibble, RW
    URBAN TRANSPORT VI: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, 6 : 445 - 454