FDG-PET imaging for the assessment of physiologic volume response during radiotherapy in cervix cancer

被引:53
|
作者
Lin, Lilie L.
Yang, Zhiyun
Mutic, Sasa
Miller, Tom R.
Grigsby, Perry W.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Alvin J Siteman Canc Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
positron emission tomography; cervix; FDG-PET; tumor volume;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.12.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the physiologic tumor volume response during treatment in cervical cancer using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of 32 patients. Physiologic tumor volume in cubic centimeters was determined from the FDG-PET images using the 40% threshold method. Results: The mean pretreatment tumor volume was 102 cm(3). The mean volume by clinical Stages I, II, and III were 54, 79, and 176 cm(3), respectively. After 19.8 Gy external irradiation to the pelvis, the reduction in tumor was 29% (72 cm(3)). An additional 13 Gy from high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy reduced the mean to 15.4 cm(3), and this was subsequently reduced to 8.6 cm(3) with 13 Gy additional HDR brachytherapy (26 Gy, HDR). Four patients had physiologic FDG uptake in the cervix at 3 months after the completion of therapy. The mean time to the 50% reduction in physiologic tumor volume was 19.9 days and after combined external irradiation and HDR to 24.9 Gy. Conclusion: These results indicate that physiologic tumor volume determination by FDG-PET is feasible and that a 50% physiologic tumor volume reduction occurs within 20 days of starting therapy. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of therapy response in lymphoma: Role of FDG-PET
    Julian, A.
    Wagner, T.
    Payoux, P.
    Hitzel, A.
    Esquerre, J. -P.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2011, 35 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [32] FDG-PET Imaging in Sarcoidosis
    Tana, Claudio
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [33] The conception of FDG-PET imaging
    Alavi, A
    Reivich, M
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 32 (01) : 2 - 5
  • [34] Feasibility of FDG-PET/CT imaging during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Bjerregaard, Jon K.
    Fischer, Barbara M.
    Vilstrup, Mie H.
    Petersen, Henrik
    Mortensen, Michael B.
    Hansen, Christian R.
    Asmussen, Jon T.
    Pfeiffer, Per
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul F.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2011, 50 (08) : 1250 - 1252
  • [35] MYOCARDITIS ON FDG-PET IMAGING
    Chaaban, Nourhan
    Kshatriya, Shilpa
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 3433 - 3433
  • [36] A case of pancreatic cancer unrecognized on FDG-PET imaging
    Tasaki, Kentaro
    Ooshima, Ikuya
    Ariga, Takamitsu
    Yoshimura, Seiji
    Shinoto, Koichi
    Okazaki, Yasushi
    Ozaki, Masahiko
    Nagase, Hajime
    Fujiwara, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 22 : A249 - A249
  • [37] Imaging of depression in cancer patients using FDG-PET
    Tashiro, M
    Juengling, F
    Reinhardt, M
    Brink, I
    Hoegerle, S
    Kubota, K
    Itoh, M
    Sasaki, H
    Nitzsche, E
    Moser, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1999, 26 (09): : 1010 - 1010
  • [38] FDG-PET and beyond: Molecular breast cancer imaging
    Quon, A
    Gambhir, SS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (08) : 1664 - 1673
  • [39] Imaging of oesophageal cancer with FDG-PET/CT and MRI
    van Rossum, P. S. N.
    van Lier, A. L. H. M. W.
    Lips, I. M.
    Meijer, G. J.
    Reerink, O.
    van Vulpen, M.
    Lam, M. G. E. H.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (01) : 81 - 95
  • [40] FDG-PET Imaging and Assessment of Tumor Dose Response (SF2) Distribution
    Yan, D.
    Chen, S.
    Krauss, D. J.
    Chen, P. Y.
    Wilson, G. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : S197 - S198