Mouse Model of Tracheal Replacement With Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds

被引:15
|
作者
Dharmadhikari, Sayali [1 ,2 ]
Best, Cameron A. [1 ,3 ]
King, Nakesha [4 ]
Henderson, Michaela [5 ]
Johnson, Jed [5 ]
Breuer, Christopher K. [1 ,6 ]
Chiang, Tendy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Ctr Regenerat Med, Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[2] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, 700 Childrens Dr,WB4154, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Biomed Sci Grad Program, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Nanofiber Solut Inc, Hilliard, OH USA
[6] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
来源
关键词
tissue engineered trachea; tracheal stenosis; biomaterials; micro computed tomography; ENGINEERED VASCULAR GRAFTS; TISSUE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; TRANSPLANTATION; TRANSLATION; HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.1177/0003489419826134
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The clinical experience with tissue-engineered tracheal grafts (TETGs) has been fraught with graft stenosis and delayed epithelialization. A mouse model of orthotopic replacement that recapitulates the clinical findings would facilitate the study of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying graft stenosis. Methods: Electrospun nanofiber tracheal scaffolds were created using nonresorbable (polyethylene terephthalate + polyurethane) and co-electrospun resorbable (polylactide-co-caprolactone/polyglycolic acid) polymers (n = 10/group). Biomechanical testing was performed to compare load displacement of nanofiber scaffolds to native mouse tracheas. Mice underwent orthotopic tracheal replacement with syngeneic grafts (n = 5) and nonresorbable (n = 10) and resorbable (n = 10) scaffolds. Tissue at the anastomosis was evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), K5+ basal cells were evaluated with the help of immunofluorescence testing, and cellular infiltration of the scaffold was quantified. Micro computed tomography was performed to assess graft patency and correlate radiographic and histologic findings with respiratory symptoms. Results: Synthetic scaffolds were supraphysiologic in compression tests compared to native mouse trachea (P < .0001). Nonresorbable scaffolds were stiffer than resorbable scaffolds (P = .0004). Eighty percent of syngeneic recipients survived to the study endpoint of 60 days postoperatively. Mean survival with nonresorbable scaffolds was 11.40 +/- 7.31 days and 6.70 +/- 3.95 days with resorbable scaffolds (P = .095). Stenosis manifested with tissue overgrowth in nonresorbable scaffolds and malacia in resorbable scaffolds. Quantification of scaffold cellular infiltration correlated with length of survival in resorbable scaffolds (R-2 = 0.95, P = .0051). Micro computed tomography demonstrated the development of graft stenosis at the distal anastomosis on day 5 and progressed until euthanasia was performed on day 11. Conclusion: Graft stenosis seen in orthotopic tracheal replacement with synthetic tracheal scaffolds can be modeled in mice. The wide array of lineage tracing and transgenic mouse models available will permit future investigation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying TETG stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recent Advancements on Three-Dimensional Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
    Yujie Chen
    Xutao Dong
    Muhammad Shafiq
    Gregory Myles
    Norbert Radacsi
    Xiumei Mo
    Advanced Fiber Materials, 2022, 4 : 959 - 986
  • [32] Electrospun polyvinyl alcohol/carbon dioxide modified polyethyleneimine composite nanofiber scaffolds
    Wu, Han-Bing
    Bremner, David H.
    Nie, Hua-Li
    Quan, Jing
    Zhu, Li-Min
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2015, 29 (10) : 1407 - 1417
  • [33] Platelet lysate loaded electrospun scaffolds: Effect of nanofiber types on wound healing
    Cordenonsi, Leticia Malgarim
    Faccendini, Angela
    Rossi, Silvia
    Bonferoni, Maria Cristina
    Malavasi, Lorenzo
    Raffin, Renata
    Scherman Schapoval, Elfrides Eva
    Del Fante, Claudia
    Vigani, Barbara
    Miele, Dalila
    Sandri, Giuseppina
    Ferrari, Franca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 2019, 142 : 247 - 257
  • [34] Electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for the propagation and analysis of breast cancer stem cells in vitro
    Prieto, E., I
    Mojares, E. B. A.
    Cortez, J. J. M.
    Vasquez, M. R., Jr.
    BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2021, 16 (03)
  • [35] Electrospun Chitosan-Based Nanofiber Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering Applications
    Hussain, Ali
    Collins, George
    Cho, Cheul H.
    2010 IEEE 36TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2010,
  • [36] Graphene-enhanced PCL electrospun nanofiber scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering
    Munoz-Gonzalez, Ana M.
    Leal-Marin, Sara
    Clavijo-Grimaldo, Dianney
    Glasmacher, Birgit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2024, 47 (08): : 633 - 641
  • [37] Recent Advancements on Three-Dimensional Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
    Chen, Yujie
    Dong, Xutao
    Shafiq, Muhammad
    Myles, Gregory
    Radacsi, Norbert
    Mo, Xiumei
    ADVANCED FIBER MATERIALS, 2022, 4 (05) : 959 - 986
  • [38] Development of Tracheal Scaffolds Using Hybridization of PLLA Coil Skeleton and Electrospun Structures
    Hung, Shih-Han
    Chen, Po-Yueh
    Tai, Chien-Cheng
    Chou, Chih-Hung
    Cheng, Wen-Ling
    Tseng, How
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 34 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [39] Morphological Effects of HA on the Cell Compatibility of Electrospun HA/PLGA Composite Nanofiber Scaffolds
    Haider, Adnan
    Gupta, Kailash Chandra
    Kang, Inn-Kyu
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [40] Indirect coculture of stem cells with fetal chondrons using PCL electrospun nanofiber scaffolds
    Nikpou, Parisa
    Rad, Jafar Soleimani
    Nejad, Daryoush Mohammad
    Samadi, Nasser
    Roshangar, Leila
    Navali, Amir Mohammad
    Shafaei, Hajar
    Charoudeh, Hojjatollah Nozad
    Oskoei, Neda Danandeh
    Rad, Sara Soleimani
    ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 45 (02) : 283 - 290