共 50 条
Predictors of mortality in acute lung injury during the era of lung protective ventilation
被引:114
|作者:
Seeley, E.
[1
,2
]
McAuley, D. F.
[3
]
Eisner, M.
[1
,2
]
Miletin, M.
[1
,2
,4
]
Matthay, M. A.
[1
,2
]
Kallet, R. H.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Cardiovasc Res, Dept Anesthesia, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Cardiovasc Res, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Resp Med Res Grp, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] William Osler Hlth Ctr, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源:
关键词:
D O I:
10.1136/thx.2007.093658
中图分类号:
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Lung protective ventilation has been widely adopted for the management of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS). Consequently, ventilator associated lung injury and mortality have decreased. It is not known if this ventilation strategy changes the prognostic value of previously identified demographic and pulmonary predictors of mortality, such as respiratory compliance and the arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (Pao(2)/Fio(2)). Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory and pulmonary variables were recorded in 149 patients with ALI/ARDS. Significant predictors of mortality were identified in bivariate analysis and these were entered into multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors of mortality. Results: Hospital mortality was 41%. In the bivariate analysis, 17 variables were significantly correlated with mortality, including age, APACHE II score and the presence of cirrhosis. Pulmonary parameters associated with death included Pao(2)/Fio(2) and oxygenation index ((mean airway pressure x Fio(2) x 100) divided by Pao(2)). In unadjusted analysis, the odds ratio (OR) of death for Pao(2)/Fio(2) was 1.57 (CI 1.12 to 3.04) per standard deviation decrease. However, in adjusted analysis, Pao(2)/Fio(2) was not a statistically significant predictor of death, with an OR of 1.29 (CI 0.82 to 2.02). In contrast, oxygenation index (OI) was a statistically significant predictor of death in both unadjusted analysis (OR 1.89 (CI 1.28 to 2.78)) and in adjusted analysis (OR 1.84 (CI 1.13 to 2.99)). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with ALI/ARDS, OI was an independent predictor of mortality, whereas Pao(2)/Fio(2) was not. OI may be a superior predictor because it integrates both airway pressure and oxygenation into a single variable.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 998
页数:5
相关论文