The utility of mitotic index, oestrogen receptor and Ki-67 measurements in the creation of novel prognostic indices for node-negative breast cancer

被引:78
|
作者
Clahsen, PC
van de Velde, CJH
Duval, C
Pallud, C
Mandard, AM
Delobelle-Deroide, A
van den Broek, L
van de Vijver, MJ
机构
[1] European Org Res Treatment Canc, Eortc Data Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Leiden Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden State Univ, Dept Pathol, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Ctr Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
[5] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Lab Anat & Cytol Pathol, St Cloud, France
[6] Ctr Francois Baclesse, Serv Anat Pathol, F-14021 Caen, France
[7] Ctr Oscar Lambret, F-59020 Lille, France
[8] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 1999年 / 25卷 / 04期
关键词
breast cancer; prognosis; oestrogen receptor; Ki-67;
D O I
10.1053/ejso.1999.0657
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prognostic factors can be useful to identify node-negative patients at increased risk of relapse who should receive adjuvant treatment. In the past, oestrogen receptor status and mitotic index have been shown to be significant predictors of prognosis. Different techniques for the measurement of these prognostic factors are available. Methods: Paraffin-embedded tumour specimens from 441 pre-menopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer who were previously randomized onto a trial comparing peri-operative chemotherapy with no further therapy were studied. Oestrogen receptor status was determined by the classical biochemical assay and by immunohistochemistry (ER-IA). Mitotic index wits assessed by counting the number of mitoses and by calculating the percentage of tumour cells positively staining for the antibody Ki-67. Results. There was a good correlation between ER-IA and the biochemical ER-assay (P < 0.01), and the percentage of Ki-67 positive tumour cells and mitotic counts (P < 0.01) respectively. However, ER-IA significantly predicted disease-free survival (RR = 2.67, 95% CT: 1.60-4.44, P < 0.01) whereas the biochemical assay was only borderline significant (RR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.00-2.36, P = 0.05). Similarly, Ki-67 was a stronger indicator of prognosis (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.80-4.48, P < 0.01) than mitotic counts (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.22-2.00, P < 0.01). Conclusions. We conclude that ER-IA performs better in predicting prognosis than the classical biochemical oestrogen receptor assay. Ki-67 is a more accurate marker for tumour cell proliferation and predicts prognosis of patients with breast cancer better than do mitotic counts.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 363
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prognostic and predictive potential of Ki-67 in triple-negative breast cancer
    Xiuzhi Zhu
    Li Chen
    Binhao Huang
    Yue Wang
    Lei Ji
    Jiong Wu
    Genhong Di
    Guangyu Liu
    Keda Yu
    Zhimin Shao
    Zhonghua Wang
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [32] The prognostic and predictive potential of Ki-67 in triple-negative breast cancer
    Zhu, Xiuzhi
    Chen, Li
    Huang, Binhao
    Wang, Yue
    Ji, Lei
    Wu, Jiong
    Di, Genhong
    Liu, Guangyu
    Yu, Keda
    Shao, Zhimin
    Wang, Zhonghua
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [33] Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer
    Rakha, Emad A.
    Agarwal, Devika
    Green, Andrew R.
    Ashankyty, Ibraheem
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Ball, Graham
    Alaskandarany, Mohammed A.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (04) : 622 - 631
  • [34] New insights into the prognostic value of Ki-67 labeling index in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Shuang Hao
    Shao Zhimin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [35] Ki-67 index value and progesterone receptor status can predict prognosis and suitable treatment in node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors
    Arima, Nobuyuki
    Nishimura, Reiki
    Osako, Tomofumi
    Okumura, Yasuhiro
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Fujisue, Mamiko
    Nishiyama, Yasuyuki
    Toyozumi, Yasuo
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 17 (01) : 616 - 622
  • [36] New insights into the prognostic value of Ki-67 labeling index in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Hao, Shuang
    He, Zhi-Xian
    Yu, Ke-Da
    Yang, Wen-Tao
    Shao, Zhi-Min
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (17) : 24824 - 24831
  • [37] Predictive value of tumor Ki-67 expression in two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Regan, Meredith M.
    Mastropasqua, Mauro G.
    Maffini, Fausto
    Maiorano, Eugenio
    Colleoni, Marco
    Price, Karen N.
    Golouh, Rastko
    Perin, Tiziana
    Brown, R. W.
    Kovacs, Aniko
    Pillay, Komala
    Oehlschlegel, Christian
    Gusterson, Barry A.
    Castiglione-Gertsch, Monica
    Gelber, Richard D.
    Goldhirsch, Aron
    Coates, Alan S.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (03): : 207 - 212
  • [38] Prognostic significance of Ki-67 index value at the primary breast tumor in recurrent breast cancer
    Nishimura, Reiki
    Osako, Tomofumi
    Nishiyama, Yasuyuki
    Tashima, Rumiko
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Fujisue, Mamiko
    Toyozumi, Yasuo
    Arima, Nobuyuki
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 2 (06) : 1062 - 1068
  • [39] Prognostic significance of Ki-67 index value at primary breast tumor in recurrent breast cancer
    Nishimura, R.
    Osako, T.
    Nishiyama, Y.
    Tashima, R.
    Nakano, M.
    Fujisue, M.
    Toyozumi, Y.
    Arima, N.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [40] Prognostic impact of Ki-67 labeling indices with 3 different cutoff values, histological grade, and nuclear grade in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative invasive breast cancers
    Makiko Ono
    Hitoshi Tsuda
    Mayu Yunokawa
    Kan Yonemori
    Chikako Shimizu
    Kenji Tamura
    Takayuki Kinoshita
    Yasuhiro Fujiwara
    Breast Cancer, 2015, 22 : 141 - 152