alpha pi alpha theta epsilon iota alpha;
Aristotelianism;
Francis Bacon;
Christianity;
humanism;
Justus Lipsius;
natural history;
passions;
pi rho o pi alpha theta epsilon iota alpha iota;
propassiones;
Stoicism;
Edward Reynolds;
Kaspar Schoppe;
Thomas Wright;
D O I:
10.1163/157338212X631855
中图分类号:
N09 [自然科学史];
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号:
01 ;
0101 ;
010108 ;
060207 ;
060305 ;
0712 ;
摘要:
This paper examines the reception of the Stoic theory of the passions in the early modern period, highlighting various differences between the way notions such alpha pi alpha theta epsilon iota alpha (complete freedom from passions) and pi rho o pi alpha theta epsilon iota alpha iota (pre-passions) were handled and interpreted by Continental and English authors. Both groups were concerned about the compatibility of Stoicism with Christianity, but came to opposing conclusions; and while the Continental scholars drew primarily on ancient philosophical texts, the English ones relied, in addition, on experience and observation, developing a natural history of the passions.