County-Level Flood Risk Level Assessment in China Using Geographic Information System

被引:4
|
作者
Su, Xiaohui [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Yang, Siquan [2 ]
Liu, Sanchao [2 ]
Su, Wei [1 ]
Yan, Tailai [1 ]
Yang, Jianyu [1 ]
Huang, Jianxi [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Civil Affairs Peoples Republ China, Natl Comm Disaster Reduct, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
County-Level; Geographic Information System (GIS); Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Model of Assessment of Flood Disaster Risk Level; System of Flood Disaster Risk Level Assessment Indicators;
D O I
10.1166/sl.2012.1887
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Flood disaster is the most one of the seven serious natural disasters in China. In order to provide technical support and reduce the losses caused by flood disaster, the paper made a study of risk level assessment in China. The study proposed a model assessmenting flood disaster risk level which could be used to evaluate the risk level of flood disaster in each county of China. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the indicators of the model and their weights. This study calculates flood disaster risk level of each county in China and displays on the map based on Geographic Information System (GIS). The experiment indicates the flood disaster risk level in China increases from west to east, from north to south. The highest risk level is in Yuanjiang County, Jinxian County and Guangzhou area, which respectively in Hunan province, Jiangxi province and Guangdong province. In summary, the model assessmenting flood disaster risk level used in this study is a meaningful and could be used to explore flood disaster risk level not only in large scope but also in small scale.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 386
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] County-Level Assessment of Vulnerability to COVID-19 in Alabama
    Fall, Souleymane
    Abdalla, Ehsan
    Quansah, Joseph
    Franklin, Meghan J.
    Whaley-Omidire, Timmera
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [32] Assessment of county-level proxy variables for household firearm ownership
    Haviland, Miriam J.
    Gause, Emma
    Rivara, Frederick P.
    Bowen, Andrew G.
    Hanron, Amelia
    Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 148
  • [33] Prevalence of cancer risk behaviors by county-level persistent poverty
    Moss, Jennifer L.
    Pinto, Casey N.
    Shen, Chan
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025, 94
  • [35] County-level rice area estimation in southern China using remote sensing data
    Li, Qiangzi
    Zhang, Huanxue
    Du, Xin
    Wen, Ning
    Tao, Qingshan
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 8
  • [36] Economic effects of conversion from county (or county-level city) to municipal district in China
    Zhao, Biao
    Xi, Xu
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [37] Investigation Of Geographic Disparities Of Pre-diabetes And Diabetes And Associated County-level Risk Factors In Florida, 2016
    Lord, Jennifer E.
    Roberson, Shamarial L.
    Odoi, Agricola
    CIRCULATION, 2020, 141
  • [38] DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COUNTY-LEVEL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DISEASES AND PESTS OF HEBEI PROVINCE ON GIS
    Cheng, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Xie, Fangyi
    COMPUTER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE II, VOLUME 2, 2009, 295 : 991 - 1000
  • [39] Development in Fujian: A county-level perspective
    Lyons, TP
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1997, 8 (02) : 117 - 136
  • [40] County-Level Atrazine Use and Gastroschisis
    Krishnapura, Sunaya R.
    McNeer, Elizabeth
    Dupont, William D.
    Patrick, Stephen W.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (05) : E2410056