Use of Reliability Block Diagram and Fault Tree Techniques in Reliability Analysis of Emergency Diesel Generators of Nuclear Power Plants

被引:6
|
作者
de Vasconcelos, Vanderley [1 ]
Soares, Wellington Antonio [1 ]
Lopes da Costa, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
Raso, Amanda Laureano [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Desenvolvimento Tecnol Nucl CDTN CNEN, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Reliability block diagram; Fault tree; Emergency diesel generator; Nuclear power plant; Reliability;
D O I
10.33889/IJMEMS.2019.4.4-064
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Nuclear power plants (NPPs) are subjected to events such as equipment failures, human errors and common-cause failures, in an environment of complex maintenance, inspection and testing managements. These events will affect the reliability of safety-related systems, as well as the risk level of the plant. Reliability block diagram (RBD) is often used to analyze the effect of item failures on system availability, taking into account their physical arrangement in the system. Fault tree (FT) is a commonly used technique for analyzing risk and reliability in nuclear, aeronautical and chemical industries. It represents graphically the basic events that will cause an undesired top event. Loss of electrical power is one of the main events that influences safe operation of NPPs, as well as accident prevention and mitigation. In case of unavailability of offsite power, emergency diesel generators (EDGs) supply onsite electrical power. This paper carries out reliability analyses of EDGs of NPPs using both RBD and FT techniques. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages, allowing a variety of qualitative and quantitative analyses. Outcomes using these two techniques are compared for a typical NPP EDG system.
引用
收藏
页码:814 / 823
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fault Tree logical-Probabilistic Method of Wind-Diesel Complex Reliability Analysis
    Tremyasov, Vladimir
    Bobrov, Aleksey
    Krivenko, Tatiana
    2018 INTERNATIONAL URAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENERGY (URALCON), 2018, : 39 - 44
  • [42] System Reliability and Fault Tree Analysis of SeSHRS-Based Augmentation of Hydrogen: Dedicated for Combined Cycle Power Plants
    Biswal, Gyan Ranjan
    Maheshwari, R. P.
    Dewal, M. L.
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (04): : 647 - 656
  • [43] Ideas and developments in importance measures and fault-tree techniques for reliability and risk analysis
    Vaurio, Jussi K.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (02) : 99 - 107
  • [44] Layered Modeling of Event Sequence Diagram for Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Nuclear Power Plant
    Xie, Hai-yan
    Cai, Qi
    Zhang, Yang-wei
    2010 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2010,
  • [45] Risk-informed safety classification of components of auxiliary systems for emergency diesel generators in nuclear power plants
    Holmberg, J. -E.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 1589 - 1597
  • [46] Diagnostic method based on the analysis of the vibration and acoustic emission energy for emergency diesel generators in nuclear plants
    Arroyo, Jorge
    Munoz, Mariano
    Moreno, Francisco
    Bernal, Nuria
    Monne, Carlos
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2013, 74 (04) : 502 - 508
  • [47] Modelling of Safety Functions of Nuclear Power Plants Powered by Fault Tree Analysis
    Kamenicky, Jan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRIC POWER ENGINEERING 2012, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 1305 - 1307
  • [48] METHOD OF RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONTROL-SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR-POWER PLANTS
    BASU, S
    ZEMDEGS, R
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1978, 17 (01): : 105 - 116
  • [49] A comparison of the quantification aspects of human reliability analysis methods in nuclear power plants
    Park, Jooyoung
    Arigi, Awwal Mohammed
    Kim, Jonghyun
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 133 : 297 - 312
  • [50] Reliability data process and analysis of instrument and control switch in nuclear power plants
    Shi, Jie
    Shen, Deng-Hua
    Shi, Hai-Ning
    Tu, Feng-Sheng
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2010, 31 (02): : 54 - 57