Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics

被引:463
|
作者
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe [1 ]
Walz, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Landscape metrics; Service providing area (SPA); Service benefiting area (SBA); Service connecting area (SCA); Landscape structure; Ecosystem services; Landscape services; Sparial characteristics; EFFECTIVE MESH SIZE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; INDEX; CLASSIFICATION; CHALLENGES; ELEMENTS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecosystem services approach is an established framework for the balanced evaluation of ecological, economic and social landscape resources. It promotes functional synergies (win-win situations) as well as trade-offs among various benefits resulting from ecosystem processes. Spatial aspects of heterogeneity and configuration play a major role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services and hence in human wellbeing. Cultural artifacts also contribute to landscape functionality. Because of the underlying areal aspects, an additional term, landscape service has been proposed and is increasingly used (Termorshuizen and Opdam. 2009). We take a particular interest in spatial aspects of this framework and the optimization of trade-offs between landscape services. Firstly, spatial heterogeneity is assessed by means of landscape metrics computed as indicators for landscape services. Landscape heterogeneity is a key measure of biodiversity and contributes to several valuable functions. Habitat connectivity and other measures of landscape structure are also essential criteria for the behavior of metapopulations and for recreational value. Secondly, service providing areas (SPAs) are discussed as the areal basis for service provision. Similarly, service benefiting areas (SBAs) and connecting areas (SCAs) for the transfer of matter, energy and organisms between them are investigated. Place-based assessment addresses such areas. We thus show possibilities for estimating and evaluating landscape units. Thirdly, the landscape consists of the natural environment, artifacts from past human use, current human activity and even social thinking. The landscape services approach in a wider sense allows us to take social/cultural services better into account because they depend strongly on heritage assets, structural characteristics, historical conditions end even cultural specifics; which can hardly be subsumed to ecosystems. Place-based assessment is an appropriate solution for combining several spatial categories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial grain size effects of landscape metrics in different gradients of coastal areas
    Zhang, Yingjia
    Han, Huiqing
    Liu, Yue
    TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 64 (04) : 579 - 600
  • [32] Spatial grain size effects of landscape metrics in different gradients of coastal areas
    Yingjia Zhang
    Huiqing Han
    Yue Liu
    Tropical Ecology, 2023, 64 : 579 - 600
  • [33] Ecosystem Services Accounting and AHP for Prioritizing Landscape Design Strategies in Urban Areas
    Sica, Francesco
    Fatahi, Fataneh
    Guarini, Maria Rosaria
    Imbroglini, Cristina
    Tajani, Francesco
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS-ICCSA 2024 WORKSHOPS, PT X, 2024, 14824 : 206 - 216
  • [34] Ecosystem services and gender in rural areas of Nicaragua: Different perceptions about the landscape
    Andres Cifuentes-Espinosa, Jaime
    Feintrenie, Laurene
    Gutierrez-Montes, Isabel
    Sibelet, Nicole
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50
  • [35] Cultural ecosystem services: Linking landscape and social attributes to ecotourism in protected areas
    Pinheiro, Raphael Ocelli
    Triest, Ludwig
    Lopes, Priscila F. M.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50
  • [36] Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas
    Verhagen, Willem
    Kukkala, Aija S.
    Moilanen, Atte
    van Teeffelen, Astrid J. A.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 860 - 871
  • [37] Changes in landscape structure and ecosystem services since 1850 analyzed using landscape metrics in two German municipalities
    Baude, Mike
    Meyer, Burghard C.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 152
  • [38] Changing dynamics of livelihood dependence on ecosystem services at temporal and spatial scales: An assessment in the southern wetland areas of Bangladesh
    Huq, Nazmul
    Pedroso, Rui
    Bruns, Antje
    Ribbe, Lars
    Huq, Saleemul
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 110
  • [39] Selecting landscape metrics as indicators of spatial heterogeneity-A comparison among Greek landscapes
    Plexida, Sofia G.
    Sfougaris, Athanassios I.
    Ispikoudis, Ioannis P.
    Papanastasis, Vasilios P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2014, 26 : 26 - 35
  • [40] Integrating ecosystem organization, quality and services indicators in the ecological security assessment
    Tang, Butian
    Wang, Hao
    Peng, Lixian
    Wang, Zhuangzhuang
    Liu, Jiamin
    Zhang, Liwei
    Jiao, Lei
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 34 (15) : 4561 - 4574