Balancing the GHG emissions and operational costs for a mixed fleet of electric buses and diesel buses

被引:29
|
作者
Shao, Shuai [1 ]
Tan, Zhijia [1 ]
Liu, Zhiyuan [2 ]
Shang, Wenlong [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Maritime Univ, Sch Maritime Econ & Management, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Transportat, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Metropolitan Transportat, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
关键词
Greenhouse gas emissions; Operational costs; Electric buses; Diesel buses; Fleet allocation; TRANSIT ASSIGNMENT; FUEL CONSUMPTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120188
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Making the urban buses electric is regarded as a major strategy to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental impacts of fossil fuels. In practice, not all diesel buses (DBs) are replaced by electric buses (EBs) because of budget constraint. This paper investigates the balance of the deployment problem for a mixed fleet with DBs and EBs in the sense of total GHG emissions and operational costs by incorporating the effect of the spatial-temporal passenger flows. The balance strategy of fleet deployment is defined the Pareto optimal allocation of EBs among bus lines to minimize simultaneously the total operational cost and GHG emissions. A real-world urban bus system of Liuzhou City in China is conducted. We find that the bus lines located in the downtown with higher passenger loading would prefer to adopt EBs at the peak hours, and most DBs are allocated to the bus lines with long travel distance at off-peak hours in the suburb. Therefore, the reduced emission by adopting EBs mainly concentrates on the center of the city, and more produced emissions of DBs are distributed far away from the downtown. When all DBs replaced by EBs, the upper bound of the carbon emission reduction ratio is 77.04%, which reduces from 207.15 tons to 47.56 tons per day.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of diesel fuel sulfur on nanoparticle emissions from city buses
    Ristovski, ZD
    Jayaratne, ER
    Lim, M
    Ayoko, GA
    Morawska, L
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (04) : 1314 - 1320
  • [42] Fine urban and precursor emissions control for diesel urban transit buses
    Lanni, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2003, 123 (03) : 427 - 437
  • [43] Diesel emissions from cars much worse than trucks and buses
    Burki, Talha Khan
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (02): : 98 - 98
  • [44] Emissions life cycle assessment of charging infrastructures for electric buses
    Zhao, Enoch
    May, Ethan
    Walker, Paul D.
    Surawski, Nic C.
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 48
  • [45] Electric buses' sustainability effects, noise, energy use, and costs
    Boren, Sven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 14 (12) : 956 - 971
  • [46] In-use emissions testing of diesel-driven buses in Southampton: is selective catalytic reduction as effective as fleet operators think?
    Sowman, Jonathan
    Box, Simon
    Wong, Alan
    Grote, Matt
    Laila, Dina S.
    Gillam, Gus
    Cruden, Andrew J.
    Preston, John M.
    Fussey, Peter
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2018, 12 (06) : 521 - 526
  • [47] Impact of Connected Automated Buses in a Mixed Fleet Scenario With Connected Automated Cars
    Sinha, Amolika
    Bassil, Daniel
    Chand, Sai
    Virdi, Navreet
    Dixit, Vinayak
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (08) : 11982 - 11993
  • [48] New city bus concepts - Duo buses, low-floor diesel-electric buses with electric single-wheel drive
    Niemann, K
    BUS AND COACH '96, 1996, 1996 (09): : 3 - 13
  • [49] Operational charging methods for electric buses: a case study for BRT Istanbul
    Kaymaz, Habib
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2023, 30 (03) : 303 - 316
  • [50] Driving Style Comparison of City Buses: Electric vs. Diesel
    Vepsalainen, Jari
    2017 IEEE VEHICLE POWER AND PROPULSION CONFERENCE (VPPC), 2017,