Effect of transthoracic impedance on cardioversion efficacy: Rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

被引:0
|
作者
Mittal, S
Ayati, S
Stein, KM
Markowitz, SM
Slotwiner, DJ
Scheiner, MA
Lerman, BB
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Coll Med, New York, NY USA
[2] Zoll Med Corp, Burlington, MA USA
[3] Cornell Univ, New York Hosp, Coll Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
3810
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 721
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and post-shock skeletal muscle injury
    Marinsek, M
    Bervar, M
    Zohar, P
    Bicanic, MP
    Mocnik, FS
    Podbregar, M
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 287 - 287
  • [12] Comparison between zoll biphasic rectilinear waveform and standard monophasic waveform in atrial fibrillation transthoracic electric cardioversion
    Santomauro, M
    Donnici, G
    Ottaviano, L
    Borrelli, A
    da Prato, D
    Chiariello, M
    CLINICAL CARDIAC PACING AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, : 243 - 249
  • [13] Biphasic waveform cardioversion as an alternative to internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation refractory to conventional monophasic waveform transthoracic shock
    Benditt, DG
    Samniah, N
    Iskos, D
    Lurie, KG
    Padanilam, BJ
    Sakaguchi, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (12): : 1426 - +
  • [14] Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform energy versus truncated exponential biphasic waveform energy for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Kim, ML
    Kim, SG
    Park, DS
    Gross, JN
    Ferrick, KJ
    Palma, EC
    Fisher, JD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (11): : 1438 - 1440
  • [15] Comparison of monophasic versus biphasic cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
    M Vaisman
    MI Bittencourt
    HCV Rey
    FOD Rangel
    RM Rocha
    RC Costa Filho
    LA Campos
    FLB Gutierrez
    AI Bronchtein
    R Esporcatte
    Critical Care, 9 (Suppl 2):
  • [16] Effect of manual pressure on transthoracic impedance during cardioversion for atrial fibrillation
    Dixit, S
    Hsia, H
    Marchlinski, FE
    Kocovic, DZ
    Pavri, BB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 96A - 96A
  • [17] Energy requirements for transthoracic electrical cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias with biphasic shocks
    Reisinger, J
    Winter, T
    Zeindlhofer, E
    Höllinger, K
    Mori, M
    Steinhuber, A
    Kühn, P
    Siostrzonek, P
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 366 - 366
  • [18] Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation
    Mittal, S
    Ayati, S
    Stein, KM
    Knight, BP
    Morady, F
    Schwartzman, D
    Cavlovich, D
    Platia, EV
    Calkins, H
    Tchou, PJ
    Miller, JM
    Wharton, JM
    Sung, RJ
    Slotwiner, DJ
    Markowitz, SM
    Lerman, BB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (05) : 1595 - 1601
  • [19] Association between transthoracic impedance and electrical cardioversion success with biphasic defibrillators: An analysis of 1055 shocks for atrial fibrillation and flutter
    Sadek, Mouhannad M.
    Chaugai, Varsha
    Cleland, Mark J.
    Zakutney, Timothy J.
    Birnie, David H.
    Ramirez, F. Daniel
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (05) : 666 - 670
  • [20] Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation
    Bardy, GH
    Marchlinski, FE
    Sharma, AD
    Worley, SJ
    Luceri, RM
    Yee, R
    Halperin, BD
    Fellows, CL
    Ahern, TS
    Chilson, DA
    Packer, DL
    Wilber, DJ
    Mattioni, TA
    Reddy, R
    Kronmal, RA
    Lazzara, R
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (10) : 2507 - 2514