Bioaerosols during transanal minimally invasive surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Dalli, Jeffrey [1 ]
Hardy, Niall [1 ]
Khan, M. Faraz [1 ,2 ]
Cahill, Ronan A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Ctr Precis Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Dublin, Ireland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Aerosols; TAMIS; TATME; Surgical team safety; Surgical smoke;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-020-03796-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is concern regarding bioaerosols from patients having procedures impacting surgical team safety. As pathogens and pollutants have been found in surgical smoke, we examined the potential for aerosol escape during transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) which may be particularly important given the presence of faecal contamination in the operative workspace and the specifics of its access platforms. Methods Both qualitative (thermographic imaging) and quantificative (particle counting) methods were used to assess for aerosol release during TAMIS in comparison to laparoscopic operations of similar duration and equipment both at times of surgical dissection and without. TAMIS was performed using a Gelport Path Device (Applied Medical) and Airseal insufflation with valveless trocar (ConMed). Results Significant carbon dioxide (CO2) escapes during TAMIS carrying with it considerable numbers of particles. In general, particle counts were low prior to tissue dissection phases of the operation but increased substantially (25 x 10(6)/m(3) or over 40x background counts) during hook cautery dissection. The majority of particles were in the 0.3-0.5 micron range (where counts were increased relative to background between 42x and 65) with the highest relative increase versus background in the 0.5-1.0 micron range. Particle counts < 5 were substantially greater during the TAMIS procedure versus laparoscopic procedures (a laparoscopic-assisted parastomal hernia repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy) employing similar tools. Conclusions Considerable amounts of particle-rich aerosols escape during TAMIS procedures. Although pathogens are not proven to definitely spread to healthcare staff by such material nebulisation, N95/FFP2 masks, at a minimum, seem prudent while other methods evolve to eliminate this risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1068
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcome of minimally invasive transanal surgery for rectal tumors
    Maeda, K
    Maruta, M
    Hanai, T
    Sato, H
    Masumori, K
    Koide, Y
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (06) : 1041 - 1041
  • [32] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery - a video vignette
    Feeney, Gerard
    Hannan, Enda
    Ullah, Fahad
    Walsh, Dara
    Coffey, J. Calvin
    Peirce, Colin
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (11) : 3050 - 3050
  • [33] Transanal minimally invasive surgery for resection of retrorectal cyst
    McCarroll, Richard H.
    Moore, Leslie J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2018, (02):
  • [34] Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Polyps
    Friedman, Garrett
    Rodriguez, Miguel
    CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2024, 37 (05) : 289 - 294
  • [35] Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Lesions
    Yao, Hong-Liang
    Ngu, James Chi-Yong
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Chen, Chia-Che
    Chang, Sheng-Wei
    Kuo, Li-Jen
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (02) : 181 - 186
  • [36] Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Hayashi, Shigeoki
    Takayama, Tadatoshi
    Ikarashi, Masahito
    Hagiwara, Ken
    Matsuno, Yoritaka
    Suzuki, Takeki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (12): : 6746 - 6753
  • [37] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a case series
    Lo, Karina W.
    Blitzer, David N.
    Shoucair, Sami
    Lisle, David M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (01): : 793 - 799
  • [38] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a case series
    Karina W. Lo
    David N. Blitzer
    Sami Shoucair
    David M. Lisle
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 793 - 799
  • [39] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery in a cadaveric model
    Atallah, S. B.
    Albert, M. R.
    deBeche-Adams, T. H.
    Larach, S. W.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2011, 15 (04) : 461 - 464
  • [40] eTAMIS: endoscopic visualization for transanal minimally invasive surgery
    Elisabeth C. McLemore
    Alisa Coker
    Garth Jacobsen
    Mark A. Talamini
    Santiago Horgan
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 1842 - 1845