Bioaerosols during transanal minimally invasive surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Dalli, Jeffrey [1 ]
Hardy, Niall [1 ]
Khan, M. Faraz [1 ,2 ]
Cahill, Ronan A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Ctr Precis Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Dublin, Ireland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Aerosols; TAMIS; TATME; Surgical team safety; Surgical smoke;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-020-03796-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is concern regarding bioaerosols from patients having procedures impacting surgical team safety. As pathogens and pollutants have been found in surgical smoke, we examined the potential for aerosol escape during transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) which may be particularly important given the presence of faecal contamination in the operative workspace and the specifics of its access platforms. Methods Both qualitative (thermographic imaging) and quantificative (particle counting) methods were used to assess for aerosol release during TAMIS in comparison to laparoscopic operations of similar duration and equipment both at times of surgical dissection and without. TAMIS was performed using a Gelport Path Device (Applied Medical) and Airseal insufflation with valveless trocar (ConMed). Results Significant carbon dioxide (CO2) escapes during TAMIS carrying with it considerable numbers of particles. In general, particle counts were low prior to tissue dissection phases of the operation but increased substantially (25 x 10(6)/m(3) or over 40x background counts) during hook cautery dissection. The majority of particles were in the 0.3-0.5 micron range (where counts were increased relative to background between 42x and 65) with the highest relative increase versus background in the 0.5-1.0 micron range. Particle counts < 5 were substantially greater during the TAMIS procedure versus laparoscopic procedures (a laparoscopic-assisted parastomal hernia repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy) employing similar tools. Conclusions Considerable amounts of particle-rich aerosols escape during TAMIS procedures. Although pathogens are not proven to definitely spread to healthcare staff by such material nebulisation, N95/FFP2 masks, at a minimum, seem prudent while other methods evolve to eliminate this risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1068
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioaerosols during transanal minimally invasive surgery
    Jeffrey Dalli
    Niall Hardy
    M. Faraz Khan
    Ronan A. Cahill
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 1065 - 1068
  • [2] Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Atallah, Sam
    Larach, Sergio W.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (01) : 92 - 93
  • [3] Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Thompson, Earl V.
    Bleier, Joshua I. S.
    CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2017, 30 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [4] Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery
    deBeche-Adams, Teresa
    Nassif, George
    CLINICS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2015, 28 (03) : 176 - 180
  • [5] Transanal minimally invasive surgery
    Wickramasinghe, Dakshitha
    Warusavitrane, Janindra
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2019, 4
  • [6] Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery
    Wexner, Steven D.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (10) : 1217 - 1218
  • [7] TRANSANAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (TAMIS)
    Albert, M.
    Larach, S.
    Atallah, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (04) : 525 - 525
  • [8] Minimally invasive approaches for transanal surgery
    Kneist, W.
    CHIRURG, 2017, 88 (08): : 656 - 663
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Anorectal Surgery: From Parks Local Excision to Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery to Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Albert, Matthew
    Atallah, Sam
    Larach, Sergio
    deBeche-Adams, Teresa
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [10] Carbon dioxide gas leaks during transanal minimally invasive surgery
    M. F. Khan
    R. A. Cahill
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020, 24 : 1307 - 1308