Risk analysis with contractual default. Does covenant breach matter?

被引:11
|
作者
Borgonovo, Emanuele [1 ]
Gatti, Stefano [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Dept Decis Sci, Milan, Italy
[2] Bocconi Univ, Dept Finance, Milan, Italy
[3] Bocconi Univ, CAREFIN, Milan, Italy
关键词
Investment analysis; Project finance; Risk analysis; Monte Carlo simulation; Coherent risk measures; Covenants; VALUE-AT-RISK; CONDITIONAL VALUE; PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION; COHERENT MEASURES; FINANCE; INVESTMENT; VIOLATIONS; DERIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.047
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A), private equity and leveraged buyouts, securitization and project finance are characterized by the presence of contractual clauses (covenants). These covenants trigger the technical default of the borrower even in the absence of insolvency. Therefore, borrowers may default on loans even when they have sufficient available cash to repay outstanding debt. This condition is not captured by the net present value (NPV) distribution obtained through a standard Monte Carlo simulation. In this paper, we present a methodology for including the consequences of covenant breach in a Monte Carlo simulation, extending traditional risk analysis in investment planning. We introduce a conceptual framework for modeling technical and material breaches from the standpoint of both lenders and shareholders. We apply this framework to a real case study concerning the project financing of a 64-million euro biomass power plant. The simulation is carried out on the actual model developed by the financial advisor of the project and made available to the authors. Results show that both technical and material breaches have a statistically significant impact on the net present value distribution, and this impact is more relevant when leverage and cost of debt increase. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 443
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk taking and risk sharing: Does responsibility matter?
    Cettolin, Elena
    Tausch, Franziska
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2015, 50 (03) : 229 - 248
  • [32] Risk taking and risk sharing: Does responsibility matter?
    Elena Cettolin
    Franziska Tausch
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2015, 50 : 229 - 248
  • [33] Analysis of Default and Prepayment Risk of Banking Mortgages
    Ko, Po-Sheng
    Wu, Cheng-Chung
    Lu, Kuo-Chih
    EDUCATION AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 3 : 386 - +
  • [34] AN ANALYSIS OF DEFAULT RISK IN MOBILE HOME CREDIT
    LAWRENCE, EC
    SMITH, LD
    RHOADES, M
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1992, 16 (02) : 299 - 312
  • [35] Does ownership affect a firm's performance and default risk in Jordan?
    Zeitun, Rami
    Tian, Gary Gang
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2007, 7 (01): : 66 - +
  • [36] How Does Aggregate Tax Policy Uncertainty Affect Default Risk?
    Tosun, Mehmet Serkan
    Yildiz, Serhat
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (12)
  • [37] Effect of External Support on Bank Default and Operating Risks: Does Country Strength Matter?
    Shen, Chung-Hua
    Huang, Yu-Li
    Lin, Kun-Li
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2018, 47 (04) : 501 - 528
  • [38] Does the Quality of Director Fusion Raise the Risk of Corporate Debt Default?
    Yu, Wencheng
    Zhang, Yikang
    Du, Kun
    Wu, Yanzhou
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [40] Does political risk matter for gold market fluctuations? A structural VAR analysis
    Ding, Qian
    Huang, Jianbai
    Gao, Wang
    Zhang, Hongwei
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 60