'Real-world' effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments: a population study

被引:148
|
作者
Kotz, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Jamie [2 ]
West, Robert [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Family Med, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] UCL, Canc Res UK Hlth Behav Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
Behavioural support; bupropion; national household survey; nicotine replacement therapy; smoking cessation; varenicline; OVER-THE-COUNTER; NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; STOP-SMOKING; GENERAL-POPULATION; ASSISTANCE; SMOKERS; PREDICTORS; DEPENDENCE; PATTERNS; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/add.12429
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims There is a need for more evidence on the 'real-world' effectiveness of commonly used aids to smoking cessation from population-level studies. This study assessed the association between abstinence and use of different smoking cessation treatments after adjusting for key potential confounding factors. Design Cross-sectional data from aggregated monthly waves of a household survey: the Smoking Toolkit Study. Setting England. Participants A total of 10 335 adults who smoked within the previous 12 months and had made at least one quit attempt during that time. Measurements Participants were classified according to their use of cessation aids in their most recent quit attempt: (i) medication (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenicline) in combination with specialist behavioural support delivered by a National Health Service Stop Smoking Service; (ii) medication provided by the prescribing health-care professional without specialist behavioural support; (iii) nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) bought over the counter; and (iv) none of these. The main outcome measure was self-reported abstinence up to the time of the survey, adjusted for key potential confounders including tobacco dependence. Findings Compared with smokers using none of the cessation aids, the adjusted odds of remaining abstinent up to the time of the survey were 3.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.05-5.15] greater in users of prescription medication in combination with specialist behavioural support, 1.61 (95% CI = 1.33-1.94) greater in users of prescription medication combined with brief advice and 0.96 (95% CI = 0.81-1.13) in users of NRT bought over the counter. Conclusions After adjusting for major confounding variables such as tobacco dependence, smokers in England who use a combination of behavioural support and pharmacotherapy in their quit attempts have almost three times the odds of success than those who use neither pharmacotherapy nor behavioural support. Smokers who buy nicotine replacement therapy over the counter with no behavioural support have similar odds of success in stopping as those who stop without any aid.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real World Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Varenicline and Cognitive-Behavioural Interventions for Smoking Cessation
    Ma Ramon, Josep
    Bruguera, Eugeni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 6 (04): : 1530 - 1538
  • [22] ANALYSIS OF THE REAL-WORLD EFFECTIVENESS OF DIRECT ACTING ANTIVIRAL TREATMENTS FOR HEPATITIS C IN A LARGE POPULATION
    McCombs, J.
    McGinnis, J.
    Fox, S.
    Tonnu-Mihara, I.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 : S217 - S217
  • [23] Prevalence of use and real-world effectiveness of smoking cessation aids during the COVID-19 pandemic: a representative study of smokers in England
    Jackson, Sarah E.
    Cox, Sharon
    Shahab, Lion
    Brown, Jamie
    ADDICTION, 2022, 117 (09) : 2504 - 2514
  • [24] Real-world comparative effectiveness of treatments for relapse prevention in MOGAD
    Virupakshaiah, Akash
    Schoeps, Vinicius
    Gambrah-Lyles, Claudia
    Chang, Gina
    Waltz, Jonathan Race Michael
    Moseley, Carson
    Zamvil, Scott
    Schuette, Allison
    Casper, Charles
    Rose, John
    Flanagan, Eoin
    Rodriguez, Moses
    Tillema, Jan-Mendelt
    Chitnis, Tanjua
    Gorman, Mark
    Graves, Jennifer
    Rensel, Mary
    Abrams, Aaron
    Krupp, Lauren
    Lotze, Tim
    Aaen, Gregory
    Wheeler, Yolanda
    Schreiner, Teri
    Waldman, Amy
    Chong, Janet
    Waubant, Emmanuelle
    Mar, Soe
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (03) : 31 - 32
  • [25] Comparing the clinical trial efficacy versus real-world effectiveness of treatments for multiple myeloma: a population-based study
    Visram, Alissa
    Chan, Kelvin Kar-Wing
    Seow, Hsien
    Pond, Gregory
    Gayowsky, Anastasia
    Mohyuddin, Ghulam Rehman
    Mccurdy, Arleigh
    Sandhu, Irwindeep
    Venner, Christopher
    Lancman, Guido
    Balitsky, Amaris
    Kouroukis, Tom
    Bruins, Robert
    Kumar, Shaji
    Fonseca, Rafael
    Mian, Hira
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2025, 110 (01) : 228 - 233
  • [26] Utilization and Effectiveness of a Message-Based Tobacco Cessation Program (mCessation) in the Chinese General Population: Longitudinal, Real-world Study
    Su, Zheng
    Wei, Xiaowen
    Cheng, Anqi
    Zhou, Xinmei
    Li, Jinxuan
    Qin, Rui
    Liu, Yi
    Xia, Xin
    Song, Qingqing
    Liu, Zhao
    Zhao, Liang
    Xiao, Dan
    Wang, Chen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [27] REAL-WORLD ENGAGEMENT WITH A TEXT-MESSAGE DELIVERED SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTION
    Hunt, Yvonne M.
    Sanders, Amy
    Cole-Lewis, Heather
    Schwarz, Mary
    Augustson, Erik
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 49 : S213 - S213
  • [28] Gender differences in the real-world effectiveness of smoking cessation medications: Findings from the 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey
    Smith, Philip H.
    Zhang, Ju
    Weinberger, Andrea H.
    Mazure, Carolyn M.
    McKee, Sherry A.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2017, 178 : 485 - 491
  • [29] Real-world effectiveness
    Schiermeier, Quirin
    NATURE, 2021, 598 (7882) : 553 - 553
  • [30] Prospective cohort study of the effectiveness of varenicline versus nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in the "real world"
    Kotz, Daniel
    Brown, Jamie
    West, Robert
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14