Tissue Distribution Studies of Protein Therapeutics Using Molecular Probes: Molecular Imaging

被引:41
|
作者
Williams, Simon-Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Genentech Inc, Dept Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
来源
AAPS JOURNAL | 2012年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
immunoPET; molecular imaging; positron emission tomography; zirconium-89; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; IN-VIVO; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; PET; HEAD; BIODISTRIBUTION; ANTIGEN; AGENT; RADIOHALOGENATION;
D O I
10.1208/s12248-012-9348-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Molecular imaging techniques for protein therapeutics rely on reporter labels, especially radionuclides or sometimes near-infrared fluorescent moieties, which must be introduced with minimal perturbation of the protein's function in vivo and are detected non-invasively during whole-body imaging. PET is the most sensitive whole-body imaging technique available, making it possible to perform biodistribution studies in humans with as little as 1 mg of injected antibody carrying 1 mCi (37 MBq) of zirconium-89 radiolabel. Different labeling chemistries facilitate a variety of optical and radionuclide methods that offer complementary information from microscopy and autoradiography and offer some trade-offs in whole-body imaging between cost and logistic difficulty and image quality and sensitivity (how much protein needs to be injected). Interpretation of tissue uptake requires consideration of label that has been catabolized and possibly residualized. Image contrast depends as much on background signal as it does on tissue uptake, and so the choice of injected dose and scan timing guides the selection of a suitable label and helps to optimize image quality. Although only recently developed, zirconium-89 PET techniques allow for the most quantitative tomographic imaging at millimeter resolution in small animals and they translate very well into clinical use as exemplified by studies of radiolabeled antibodies, including trastuzumab in breast cancer patients, in The Netherlands.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 399
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of paramagnetic probes for molecular recognition studies in protein kinases
    Vazquez, Jesus
    De, Surya K.
    Chen, Li-Hsing
    Riel-Mehan, Megan
    Emdadi, Aras
    Cellitti, Jason
    Stebbins, John L.
    Rega, Michele F.
    Pellecchia, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 51 (12) : 3460 - 3465
  • [22] Development of Small Molecular Probes for the Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis
    Zeng, Wenbin
    Miao, Weimin
    ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 9 (09) : 986 - 995
  • [23] Engineering Molecular Imaging Probes and Molecular Machines for Nanomedicine
    Bao, Gang
    6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NANO/MOLECULAR MEDICINE AND ENGINEERING (IEEE-NANOMED 2012), 2012,
  • [24] Molecular imaging in the development of cancer therapeutics
    Czernin, J
    Weber, WA
    Herschman, HR
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 2006, 57 : 99 - 118
  • [25] Molecular imaging, targeted therapeutics, and nanoscience
    Wickline, SA
    Lanza, GM
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, : 90 - 97
  • [26] Magnetic Resonance-Based Molecular Imaging Studies of Mice by Using Paramagnetic Contrast Probes
    Fujii, Hirotada
    Emoto, Miho
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 118 : 16P - 16P
  • [27] Molecular imaging of enzyme activity in vivo using activatable probes
    Yan, Runqi
    Ye, Deju
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2016, 61 (21) : 1672 - 1679
  • [28] Molecular Imaging of Fluorinated Probes for Tau Protein and Amyloid-β Detection
    Yeo, Sarah K.
    Shepelytskyi, Yurii
    Grynko, Vira
    Albert, Mitchell S.
    MOLECULES, 2020, 25 (15):
  • [29] Glycoconjugate probes and targets for molecular imaging using magnetic resonance
    Geraldes, Carlos F. G. C.
    Djanashvili, Kristina
    Peters, Joop A.
    FUTURE MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 2 (03) : 409 - 425
  • [30] In vivo imaging of cancer biomarkers using activatable molecular probes
    Elias, Drew R.
    Thorek, Daniel L. J.
    Chen, Antony K.
    Czupryna, Julie
    Tsourkas, Andrew
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2008, 4 (06) : 287 - 305