Validation of a national hydrological model

被引:59
|
作者
McMillan, H. K. [1 ,2 ]
Booker, D. J. [1 ]
Cattoen, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, POB 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Rainfall-runoff model; National hydrological model; Validation; Hydrological regimes; Ungauged sites; WATER-RESOURCES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DATA ASSIMILATION; DAILY RAINFALL; LARGE-SCALE; DATA SET; CALIBRATION; STREAMFLOW; RUNOFF; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.043
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Nationwide predictions of flow time-series are valuable for development of policies relating to environmental flows, calculating reliability of supply to water users, or assessing risk of floods or droughts. This breadth of model utility is possible because various hydrological signatures can be derived from simulated flow time-series. However, producing national hydrological simulations can be challenging due to strong environmental diversity across catchments and a lack of data available to aid model parameterisation. A comprehensive and consistent suite of test procedures to quantify spatial and temporal patterns in performance across various parts of the hydrograph is described and applied to quantify the performance of an uncalibrated national rainfall-runoff model of New Zealand. Flow time-series observed at 485 gauging stations were used to calculate Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency and percent bias when simulating between-site differences in daily series, between-year differences in annual series, and between-site differences in hydrological signatures. The procedures were used to assess the benefit of applying a correction to the modelled flow duration curve based on an independent statistical analysis. They were used to aid understanding of climatological, hydrological and model-based causes of differences in predictive performance by assessing multiple hypotheses that describe where and when the model was expected to perform best. As the procedures produce quantitative measures of performance, they provide an objective basis for model assessment that could be applied when comparing observed daily flow series with competing simulated flow series from any region-wide or nationwide hydrological model. Model performance varied in space and time with better scores in larger and medium-wet catchments, and in catchments with smaller seasonal variations. Surprisingly, model performance was not sensitive to aquifer fraction or rain gauge density. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:800 / 815
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of Abstraction and Discharge Data to Improve the Performance of a National-Scale Hydrological Model
    Rameshwaran, Ponnambalam
    Bell, Victoria A.
    Brown, Matthew J.
    Davies, Helen N.
    Kay, Alison L.
    Rudd, Alison C.
    Sefton, Catherine
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (01)
  • [32] Identified Model Parameterization, Calibration, and Validation of the Physically Distributed Hydrological Model WASH123D in Taiwan
    Shih, Dong-Sin
    Yeh, Gour-Tsyh
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2011, 16 (02) : 126 - 136
  • [33] An assessment of the Spanish National Hydrological Plan
    Biswas, AK
    Tortajada, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 19 (03) : 377 - 397
  • [34] A national hydrological projections service for Australia
    Wilson, Louise
    Bende-Michl, Ulrike
    Sharples, Wendy
    Vogel, Elisabeth
    Peter, Justin
    Srikanthan, Sri
    Khan, Zaved
    Matic, Vjekoslav
    Oke, Alison
    Turner, Margot
    Duong, Vi Co
    Loh, Sean
    Baron-Hay, Stuart
    Roussis, Jake
    Kociuba, Greg
    Hope, Pandora
    Dowdy, Andrew
    Donnelly, Chantal
    Argent, Robert
    Thomas, Steven
    Kitsios, Artemis
    Bellhouse, Jacquie
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2022, 28
  • [35] Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model
    Kusche, J.
    Schmidt, R.
    Petrovic, S.
    Rietbroek, R.
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2009, 83 (10) : 903 - 913
  • [36] Distributed hydrological modelling of a Mediterranean mountainous catchment - Model construction and multi-site validation
    Moussa, Roger
    Chahinian, Nanee
    Bocquillon, Claude
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 337 (1-2) : 35 - 51
  • [37] Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model
    J. Kusche
    R. Schmidt
    S. Petrovic
    R. Rietbroek
    Journal of Geodesy, 2009, 83 : 903 - 913
  • [38] Calibration and Validation of SWAT Model by Using Hydrological Remote Sensing Observables in the Lake Chad Basin
    Bennour, Ali
    Jia, Li
    Menenti, Massimo
    Zheng, Chaolei
    Zeng, Yelong
    Barnieh, Beatrice Asenso
    Jiang, Min
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [39] Impact of model development, calibration and validation decisions on hydrological simulations in West Lake Erie Basin
    Daggupati, Prasad
    Yen, Haw
    White, Michael J.
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Arnold, Jeffrey G.
    Keitzer, Conor S.
    Sowa, Scott P.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2015, 29 (26) : 5307 - 5320
  • [40] The hydrological calibration and validation of a complexly-linked watershed - reservoir model for the Occoquan watershed, Virginia
    Xu, Zhongyan
    Godrej, Adil N.
    Grizzard, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 345 (3-4) : 167 - 183