All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws

被引:50
|
作者
Green, Jamison M. [1 ]
Getelman, Mark H. [1 ]
Snyder, Stephen J. [1 ]
Burns, Joseph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Calif Orthoped Inst, Van Nuys, CA USA
关键词
FIXATION; TENDON; TENDINOPATHY; MANAGEMENT; TENOTOMY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes and healing rates after open subpectoral and all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis without the use of interference screws in patients with more than 2 years of follow-up. Methods: Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up who underwent open subpectoral biceps tenodesis or all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis without concomitant rotator cuff repair, labral repair, or Mumford procedure were considered for enrollment in the study. They were evaluated for visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and satisfaction with function and biceps contour. Ultrasonography was performed to evaluate the integrity of the tenodesis site and measure biceps muscle diameters on each arm. Results: Forty-nine patients were eligible for our study and of these, 38 were able to participate. Twenty-three patients had open subpectoral biceps tenodesis and 15 received all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. The average follow-up time was 4.5 years (range 2-9.1 years). There were no significant differences in anterior shoulder pain VAS, ASES scores, or satisfaction rates. The average anterior shoulder VAS was 0.7 +/- 1.1 for the open group and 0.9 +/- 1.8 for the arthroscopic group (P = .74). The mean ASES score for the open group was 90.6 +/- 11.4 and 91.4 +/- 13.9 for the arthroscopic group (P = .69). All patients had an intact tenodesis site on ultrasonography and the ratio of operative to nonoperative biceps diameters was 100.2% +/- 12.8% for the open group and 99.1% +/- 10.8% for the arthroscopic group (P = .66). There were no infections and no brachial plexus injuries in either group. Conclusions: Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis and all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis are both successful surgeries with consistently positive outcomes. Tenodesis can be performed in either location without interference screw fixation with durable, reliable results. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 25
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biceps Tenodesis versus Tenotomy in Treatment of Lesions of Long Head of Biceps Brachii in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
    不详
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (07):
  • [22] Arthroscopic suprapectoral levs. Open subpectoral biceps tendon tenodesis with medium-term long follow-up time
    Babasiz, Tamara
    Geyer, Stephanie
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2023, 18 (03): : 207 - 209
  • [23] Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Restoration of Length-Tension and Mechanical Strength Between Techniques
    Werner, Brian C.
    Lyons, Matthew L.
    Evans, Cody L.
    Griffin, Justin W.
    Hart, Joseph M.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Brockmeier, Stephen F.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (04): : 620 - 627
  • [24] Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head Biceps: Reproducing an Anatomic Length-Tension Relationship
    David, Tal S.
    Schildhorn, Jeffrey C.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2012, 1 (01): : E127 - E132
  • [25] Editorial Commentary: Aim High or Go Low? Outcomes Are Equivalent for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Beck, Edward C.
    Waterman, Brian R.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (01): : 33 - 35
  • [26] Tenotomy versus Tenodesis in the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions
    Galasso, Olimpio
    Gasparini, Giorgio
    De Benedetto, Massimo
    Familiari, Filippo
    Castricini, Roberto
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2012, 13
  • [27] Tenotomy versus Tenodesis in the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions
    Olimpio Galasso
    Giorgio Gasparini
    Massimo De Benedetto
    Filippo Familiari
    Roberto Castricini
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 13
  • [28] Clinical outcome comparison of suprapectoral and subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps with concomitant rotator cuff repair: A systematic review
    Ergun, Selim
    Cirdi, Yigit Umur
    Baykan, Said Erkam
    Akgun, Umut
    Karahan, Mustafa
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2022, 14 (01) : 6 - 15
  • [29] Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Tenotomy versus Subpectoral Tenodesis in Rotator Cuff Repair
    Kim, Jangwoo
    Nam, Ji Hoon
    Kim, Yuna
    Kim, Jong Seop
    Kim, Sae Hoon
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (03) : 371 - 378
  • [30] Rotator cuff tear with concomitant long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) degeneration: what is the preferred choice? Open subpectoral versus arthroscopic intraarticular tenodesis
    Mohsen Mardani-Kivi
    Sohrab Keyhani
    Mohammad-Hossein Ebrahim-Zadeh
    Keyvan Hashemi-Motlagh
    Khashayar Saheb-Ekhtiari
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2019, 20