Path Planning for Optimal Cooperative Navigation

被引:0
|
作者
Rutkowski, Adam J. [1 ]
Barnes, Jamie E. [1 ]
Smith, Andrew T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Res Lab, Munit Directorate, Eglin AFB, FL 32541 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
For many navigation scenarios, it is known that the accuracy of navigation state estimates depends on the path traveled, particularly when access to external navigation aids such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) is not available. In this work, we present a path planning method that attempts to minimize the navigation uncertainty of a pair of autonomous vehicles traveling from known initial locations to desired goal locations. For the scenario considered in this study, each vehicle has an onboard odometer for measuring relative changes in position and heading. The vehicles also have sensors for measuring the range between the vehicles. Navigation state estimates are obtained using a centralized batch factor graph approach implemented with the Georgia Tech Smoothing and Mapping (GTSAM) library. In previous work on this problem, candidate vehicle trajectories were chosen from a restricted class of trajectories referred to as pseudo-zigzagging. An exhaustive search of all possible trajectories in this class revealed that the final position uncertainty could be reduced by a factor of 5 when compared with the case of each vehicle traveling straight to its goal location. In the work we present here, the trajectories are no longer restricted to such a limited class. Instead, each path is constructed from a small set of waypoints that may be placed anywhere. We have devised a method that takes an arbitrary set of waypoint locations and adjusts their locations so that the resulting path meets travel time and maneuverability constraints. Using just 3 waypoints for each vehicle path, and applying a simple random search optimization algorithm to the waypoint locations, the final position uncertainty can be reduced by another factor of 3. Thus, we achieve a total factor of 15 reduction in position uncertainty when compared to the straight path (i.e. worst) case. Also, the results indicate that the final position uncertainty can be different for each vehicle. Furthermore, the navigation certainty does not necessarily improve with increased travel time. Thus, travel time should be considered a free parameter (i.e. the time constraint is not necessarily an active constraint). As is the case for most practical nonlinear optimization problems, there is no guarantee that the results obtained in this work are globally optimal. Nevertheless, it is quite clear that path planning can be used to significantly reduce navigation uncertainty for the scenario under consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 365
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] NAVIGATION AND PATH PLANNING OF AN AUTONOMOUS MOBILE ROBOT
    Nandikolla, Vidya K.
    Morris, Eden
    Aquino, John
    Paris, Thomas
    Wheeler, Kevin
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE2021), VOL 5, 2021,
  • [43] ETC Intelligent Navigation Path Planning Method
    Cheng, Jieren
    Liu, Boyi
    Cai, Kuanqi
    Tang, Xiangyan
    Zhang, Boyun
    JOURNAL OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 19 (02): : 619 - 631
  • [44] Path Planning for a Universal Indoor Navigation System
    Kahale, Elie
    Hanse, Pierre-Charles
    Destin, Valeria
    Uzan, Gerard
    Lopez-Krahe, Jaime
    COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, PT II (ICCHP 2016), 2016, 9759 : 190 - 197
  • [45] Optimal Searching Time Allocation for Information Collection Under Cooperative Path Planning of Multiple UAVs
    Li, Yanmin
    Liu, Lihua
    Wu, Jibing
    Wang, Mao
    Zhou, Haohao
    Huang, Hongbin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 6 (05): : 1030 - 1043
  • [46] Multi-Conflict-Based Optimal Algorithm for Multi-UAV Cooperative Path Planning
    Liu, Xiaoxiong
    Su, Yuzhan
    Wu, Yan
    Guo, Yicong
    DRONES, 2023, 7 (03)
  • [47] Cooperative coverage path planning for visual inspection
    Mansouri, Sina Sharif
    Kanellakis, Christoforos
    Fresk, Emil
    Kominiak, Dariusz
    Nikolakopoulos, George
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2018, 74 : 118 - 131
  • [48] Adaptive cooperative path planning for multiple platforms
    Chen, G.
    Kwan, C.
    Shen, D.
    Cruz, J. B., Jr.
    Vannevel, A.
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS, 2006, : 168 - +
  • [49] Cooperative organic mine avoidance path planning
    McCubbin, CB
    Piatko, CD
    Peterson, AV
    Donnald, CR
    Cohen, D
    Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets X, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5794 : 1310 - 1317
  • [50] Cooperative and Geometric Learning for Path Planning of UAVs
    Zhang, Baochang
    Mao, Zhili
    Liu, Wanquan
    Liu, Jianzhuang
    Zheng, Zheng
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2013, : 69 - 78