Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Family Impact Scale

被引:1
|
作者
Cetintas, Ismail [1 ]
Kostak, Melahat Akgun [1 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Nursing, Dept Pediat Nursing, Balkan Campus, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
关键词
diabetes mellitus; family impact; scale; validity; reliability; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CONTENT VALIDITY; CHILDREN; SELF; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/jspn.12308
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Diabetes Family Impact Scale (DFIS). Methods and Design The study was carried out methodologically with 121 parents who have 6-18 year-old children with type 1 diabetes (n = 121). The collected data were analyzed by conducting confirmatory factor analysis,ttest, and Pearson's correlation analysis and by computing Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results The linguistic validity of the scale was ensured by undertaking translation and back-translation. Expert opinions were analyzed and all the content validity indices were found to be >= 0.80. The factor loadings of all the items ranged from 0.47 to 0.89, and the model fit indices were as follows:chi(2)/df = 1.21 and RMSEA = 0.04. Scores that were obtained across two temporally separated administrations were not significantly different (p > .05), and there was a strong correlation between the two sets of scores (ICC = 0.892;p < .001). The Cronbach's alpha of the scale was .881. The item-total correlation coefficients of the scale items ranged from .34 to .72. Conclusions Similar to the original assessment, the Turkish version of the DFIS consists of 14 items and 4 subscales. It is a valid and reliable measure that is suitable for use with Turkish samples. Researchers can use this scale to assess the effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus on the family of an affected child.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Riverside Eudaimonia Scale
    Yildirim, Murat
    Cagis, Zafer Guney
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 41 (03) : 351 - 358
  • [42] INDIVIDUAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE SCALE : PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE TURKISH VERSION
    Kalanlar, Bilge
    Alic, Nilgun Kuru
    Oner, Mucahide
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2024, 50 (03) : 436 - 443
  • [43] Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the perceived barriers of mammography scale
    Aker, Menekse Nazli
    Sezer, Neslihan Yilmaz
    Cengiz, Hatice oner
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (11) : 2113 - 2120
  • [44] Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Soft Drink Addiction Scale
    Kahriman, Meryem
    Bas, Murat
    Yilmaz, Salim
    NUTRIENTS, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [45] Review: Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the PedsQL (TM) Family Impact Scale
    Campbell, Steve
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2016, 21 (08) : 609 - 610
  • [46] Family Impact Scale (FIS): psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese language version
    Goursand, D.
    Paiva, S. M.
    Zarzar, P. M.
    Pordeus, I. A.
    Allison, P. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2009, 10 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [47] Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Family Awareness Scale
    Shek, DTL
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 142 (01): : 61 - 72
  • [48] Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Family Empowerment Scale
    Rajabi, Gholamreza
    Zolmajd, Zahra
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02): : 216 - 228
  • [49] Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience
    Senol-Durak, Emre
    Durak, Mithat
    MENTAL HEALTH RELIGION & CULTURE, 2019, 22 (10) : 1021 - 1032
  • [50] The Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of Self Rated Abilities for Health Practices Scale in the Gestational Diabetes Sample
    Akbag, N. N. Aypar
    Tokat, M. Alus
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 24 (11) : 1712 - 1718