A framework for understanding how activities associated with dog ownership relate to human well-being

被引:51
|
作者
Barcelos, Ana Maria [1 ]
Kargas, Niko [2 ]
Maltby, John [3 ]
Hall, Sophie [3 ]
Mills, Daniel S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lincoln, Sch Life Sci, Lincoln, England
[2] Univ Lincoln, Sch Psychol, Lincoln, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Neurosci Psychol & Behav, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
ANIMAL-ASSISTED THERAPY; PET OWNERSHIP; COMPANION-ANIMALS; SELF-DISCLOSURE; CHRONIC PAIN; WALKING; HAPPINESS; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-68446-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There is notorious inconsistency regarding mental health benefits of dog ownership, partially due to repeated cross-sectional studies comparing dog owners and non-owners, without taking into account the heterogeneity of dog-owner dyads, especially the activities with which the owners are involved. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive framework of the most important dog human related activities and their impact on owner well-being. Six focus groups with 35 dog owners were conducted, and their audio transcripts thematically analysed. Dog human related activities and themes of activities were linked to their reported changes in well-being through matrix coding. A framework of 58 dog human related activities linked with their specific hedonic well-being, life satisfaction and eudaimonic well-being outcomes was generated. Most activities were reported to improve owner's well-being, (e.g. human-dog tactile interaction increases owner's self-esteem), and a minority was mainly associated with negative outcomes. The richness of the framework presented in this study reinforces the importance of assessing dog ownership well-being outcomes based on specific dog human related activities with which dog owners are involved. This new and systematic investigative approach should decrease inconsistencies in the field and facilitate mental health interventions and study designs of a higher level of evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the New Commons
    Duraiappah, Anantha Kumar
    Asah, Stanley Tanyi
    Brondizio, Eduardo S.
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    O'Farrell, Patrick J.
    Prieur-Richard, Anne-Helene
    Subramanian, Suneetha M.
    Takeuchi, Kazuhiko
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 7 : 94 - 100
  • [42] Work related well-being is associated with individual subjective well-being
    Ray, Tapas K.
    INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 2022, 60 (03) : 242 - 252
  • [43] Well-Being as Having, Loving, Doing, and Being: An Integrative Organizing Framework for Employee Well-Being
    Martela, Frank
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2025,
  • [44] Understanding Well-being in the Oldest Old
    Berg, Anne Ingeborg
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2013, 33 : 184 - 185
  • [45] Understanding the well-being of dentistry students
    Stormon, Nicole
    Sexton, Christopher
    Ford, Pauline J.
    Eley, Diann S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2022, 26 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [46] Understanding the well-being of care receivers
    Pruchno, RA
    Burant, CJ
    Peters, ND
    GERONTOLOGIST, 1997, 37 (01): : 102 - 109
  • [47] Understanding Well-Being in the Oldest Old
    Cosco, Theodore D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2014, 33 (04): : 504 - 505
  • [48] Understanding Well-Being in Policy and Practice
    Smith, Steven R.
    Brock, Gillian
    ETHICS & SOCIAL WELFARE, 2014, 8 (03): : 215 - 217
  • [49] CAPABILITYES AND HUMAN WELL-BEING: HOW TO BRIDGE THE MISSING LINK?
    Naz, Farah
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 36 - 46
  • [50] Understanding Well-Being in the Ghanaian Context: Linkages between Lay Conceptions of Well-Being and Measures of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
    Wilson Fadiji, Angelina
    Meiring, Leana
    Wissing, Marie P.
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2021, 16 (02) : 649 - 677