Climate Response Uncertainty and the Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions

被引:35
|
作者
Newbold, Stephen C. [1 ]
Daigneault, Adam [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Econ, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] US EPA, Climate Change Div, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[3] Climate Change Div, US EPA, Washington, DC USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS | 2009年 / 44卷 / 03期
关键词
Climate change; Climate sensitivity; Uncertainty; Catastrophe; SENSITIVITY; ENSEMBLE; FUTURE; SYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-009-9290-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Some recent research suggests that uncertainty about the response of the climate system to atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations can have a disproportionately large influence on benefits estimates for climate change policies, potentially even dominating the effect of the discount rate. In this paper we conduct a series of numerical simulation experiments to investigate the quantitative significance of climate response uncertainty for economic assessments of climate change. First we characterize climate uncertainty by constructing two probability density functions-a Bayesian model-averaged and a Bayesian updated version-based on a combination of uncertainty ranges for climate sensitivity reported in the scientific literature. Next we estimate the willingness to pay of a representative agent for a range of emissions reduction policies using two simplified economic models. Our results illustrate the potential for large risk premiums in benefits estimates as suggested by the recent theoretical work on climate response uncertainty, and they show that the size and even the sign of the risk premium may depend crucially on how the posterior distribution describing the overall climate sensitivity uncertainty is constructed and on the specific shape of the damage function.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 377
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Global warming Benefits of curbing greenhouse gas emissions
    Burke, Maria
    CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2013, 77 (02) : 15 - 15
  • [22] Benefits of dealing with uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories: introduction
    Jonas, Matthias
    Marland, Gregg
    Winiwarter, Wilfried
    White, Thomas
    Nahorski, Zbigniew
    Bun, Rostyslav
    Nilsson, Sten
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2010, 103 (1-2) : 3 - 18
  • [23] Benefits of dealing with uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories: introduction
    Matthias Jonas
    Gregg Marland
    Wilfried Winiwarter
    Thomas White
    Zbigniew Nahorski
    Rostyslav Bun
    Sten Nilsson
    Climatic Change, 2010, 103 : 3 - 18
  • [24] Modeling Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biomass Feedstocks
    Curtright, Aimee
    Johnson, David
    Willis, Henry
    Samaras, Constantine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2010,
  • [25] The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping
    Lindstad, Haakon
    Asbjornslett, Bjorn E.
    Stromman, Anders H.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 46 : 386 - 398
  • [26] Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture: Pathways to Sustainable Reductions
    Li, Lidong
    Awada, Tala
    Shi, Yeyin
    Jin, Virginia L.
    Kaiser, Michael
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [27] Planning hierarchical urban transit systems for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions
    Cheng, Han
    Madanat, Samer
    Horvath, Arpad
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 49 : 44 - 58
  • [28] INTERNATIONAL REDUCTIONS OF GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS - AN EQUITABLE AND EFFICIENT APPROACH
    SOLOMON, BD
    AHUJA, DR
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1991, 1 (05): : 343 - 350
  • [29] Estimating the climate and air quality benefits of aviation fuel and emissions reductions
    Dorbian, Christopher S.
    Wolfe, Philip J.
    Waitz, Ian A.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (16) : 2750 - 2759
  • [30] A Multimodel Study of Parametric Uncertainty in Predictions of Climate Response to Rising Greenhouse Gas Concentrations
    Sanderson, Benjamin M.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2011, 24 (05) : 1362 - 1377