Streamlining genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer in a Northern California health care system

被引:16
|
作者
Powell, C. Bethan [1 ,2 ]
Laurent, Cecile [1 ]
Ciaravino, Giuseppe [3 ]
Garcia, Christine [2 ]
Han, Liz [3 ]
Hoodfar, Elizabeth [4 ]
Karlea, Audrey [4 ]
Kobelka, Christine [4 ]
Lee, Jaimie [5 ]
Littell, Ramey D. [2 ]
Roh, Janise [1 ]
Vay, Agniezka [3 ]
Kushi, Lawrence H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res Oakland, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Gynecol Canc Program, 2238 Geary Blvd 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Gynecol Canc Program, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Genet Dept, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanence Oakland, Obstet & Gynecol Residency Program, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; BRCA; Genetic testing; Streamlining; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; RISK-ASSESSMENT; BREAST; RECOMMENDATION; DISPARITIES; MUTATIONS; GERMLINE; PATTERNS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Referral to Genetics for me-testing counseling may be inefficient for women with ovarian cancer. This study assesses feasibility of gynecologic oncologists directly offering genetic testing. Methods. A prospective pilot study was conducted at two gynecologic oncology hubs in an integrated healthcare system from May 1 to November 6, 2019. Gynecologic oncologists offered multigene panel testing to women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, followed by selective genetic counseling. Outcomes were compared between study participants and women from other hubs in the health system. Results. Of ovarian cancer patients at study sites, 40 participated and all underwent genetic testing. Of 101 patients diagnosed at other sites, 85% were referred to genetics (p = .0061 compared to pilot participants) and 67% completed testing (p < .0001). The time from diagnosis to blood draw and notification of result was 185 and 34 days for the pilot group compared to 25.5 and 53 days at other sites. Panel testing detected 9 (22.5%) and 7 (103%, p = .08) pathogenic mutations in each group, respectively. Patients and providers were highly satisfied with the streamlined process. Conclusion. Genetic testing performed at the gynecologic oncology point of care for patients with ovarian cancer is feasible, increases uptake of testing, and improves time to results. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Genetic Testing Results With Mortality Among Women With Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Abrahamse, Paul
    Bondarenko, Irina
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Deapen, Dennis
    Gomez, Scarlett L.
    Morrow, Monica
    Berek, Jonathan S.
    Hofer, Timothy P.
    Katz, Steven J.
    Ward, Kevin C.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (02): : 245 - 253
  • [22] Impact of race on referral for genetics assessment for women with ovarian cancer in a large health care system
    Powell, C. Bethan
    Laurent, Cecile
    Roh, Janise
    Garcia, Christine
    Kobelka, Christine
    Karlea, Audrey
    Hoodfar, Elizabeth
    Lee, Jaimie
    Kushi, Lawrence
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S181 - S181
  • [23] Clinical counselling and care of women with a genetic risk of ovarian and breast cancer
    Schmutzler, RK
    Kempe, A
    Kiechle, M
    Beckmann, MW
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1999, 124 (18) : 563 - 566
  • [24] Impact of race, socioeconomic status, and the health care system on the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer in California
    Long, Beverly
    Chang, Jenny
    Ziogas, Argyrios
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    Bristow, Robert E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (04) : 468.e1 - 468.e9
  • [25] GENETIC TESTING IN HEALTH CARE
    Lacovara, Jane
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2018, 45 (02)
  • [26] Homelessness Among Acute Care Patients Within a Large Health Care System in Northern California
    Mudiganti, Satish
    Nasrallah, Catherine
    Brown, Stephanie
    Pressman, Alice
    Kiger, Anna
    Casey, Joan A.
    LaMori, Joyce C.
    Pesa, Jacqueline
    Azar, Kristen M. J.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2024, 27 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [27] Germline and somatic genetic testing trends among women with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Wilson, Elise
    Stock, Elizabeth
    Huang, Ruizhi
    Buchanan, Tommy
    Kotnik, Emilee
    Mullen, Mary
    Khabele, Dineo
    Kuroki, Lindsay
    Fuh, Katherine
    McCourt, Carolyn
    Thaker, Premal
    Massad, L. Stewart
    Mutch, David
    Powell, Matthew
    Hagemann, Andrea
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 166 : S112 - S112
  • [28] Mainstreamed genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: first-year experience
    Rahman, Belinda
    Lanceley, Anne
    Kristeleit, Rebecca S.
    Ledermann, Jonathan A.
    Lockley, Michelle
    McCormack, Mary
    Mould, Tim
    Side, Lucy
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2019, 56 (03) : 195 - 198
  • [29] The Value of Panel Testing for the Identification of Women with a Genetic Predispostion to Breast or Ovarian Cancer
    Tait, Jane
    Hipwell, Michael
    Mossman, David
    McPhillips, Mary
    Hall, Danielle
    Smits, Kira
    Ziolkowski, Andrew
    Scott, Rodney J.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 37 - 38
  • [30] Genetic testing for epithelial ovarian cancer
    Amin, Noa
    Chaabouni, Narda
    George, Angela
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 65 : 125 - 138