Impact of patient acuity on preference for information and autonomy in decision making

被引:32
|
作者
Davis, MA
Hoffman, JR
Hsu, J
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Ctr Emergency Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
patient acuity; patient preferences; autonomy; decision making; age; education;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb01206.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To test the hypotheses that ED patients' desires for medical information and for autonomy in decision making are inversely related to increasing acuity of illness, increasing age, and lower level of formal education. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of ED patients who presented for care during seven nonconsecutive 24-hour periods. Of 804 patients approached, 665 completed a questionnaire that was administered by a trained research assistant. Patients rated their desire for medical information, and for participation in medical decision making, on two 10-cm visual analog scales. Patient acuity level was determined in routine fashion by trained triage nurses, who were unaware of the nature of this study. Results: Desire for information was uniformly high, and did not vary statistically between triage groups (p = 0.41). The most acutely ill patients (level I) were more likely to be excluded by the research interviewer (p < 0.001). Of included level I patients, desire to participate was not decreased (p < 0.01). Higher level of formal education (p = 0.036) and younger age (p < 0.001) were associated with greater desire for autonomy in decision making. Conclusion: Among ED patients able to participate, higher acuity of illness was not associated with a decreased desire for medical information. Many very acutely ill patients preferred autonomy in medical decision making. Older patients and those with less formal education expressed a lesser desire for decision-making autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 785
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The influence of information order on patient decision making
    Bergus, GR
    Levin, IP
    Johnson, C
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 460 - 460
  • [32] Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making
    Martin P. Ho
    Juan Marcos Gonzalez
    Herbert P. Lerner
    Carolyn Y. Neuland
    Joyce M. Whang
    Michelle McMurry-Heath
    A. Brett Hauber
    Telba Irony
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 2984 - 2993
  • [33] Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making
    Ho, Martin P.
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Lerner, Herbert P.
    Neuland, Carolyn Y.
    Whang, Joyce M.
    McMurry-Heath, Michelle
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Irony, Telba
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (10): : 2984 - 2993
  • [34] Patient Preference and Satisfaction in Decision-Making Process Response
    Lee, Jae Jun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (07) : 1031 - 1031
  • [35] Beyond decision-making: A contextual and multidimensional view of patient autonomy
    Valero, Arrieta
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2023, 38 (05) : 315 - 320
  • [36] Rethinking autonomy: decision making between patient and surgeon in advanced illnesses
    Wancata, Lauren M.
    Hinshaw, Daniel B.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (04)
  • [37] Does shared decision making respect a patient's relational autonomy?
    Lewis, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 1063 - 1069
  • [38] Patient autonomy in clinical decision making and related factors among the elderly
    Matsui, M
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 23 - 23
  • [39] Decision-making surrogacy as a potential violation of patient autonomy.
    Guenther, RT
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 42 (02) : 137 - 137
  • [40] Impact of Raw Information on Prudent Decision Making
    Hanif, Huma
    Hanif, Usman
    Ehsan, Nadeem
    Mirza, Ibtisam
    Ahmad, Hanif
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOL 9 (ICCSIT 2010), 2010, : 41 - 48