Environmental and socio-economic assessment of wood pellet production from fast growing trees in Thailand

被引:3
|
作者
Saosee, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sajjakulnukit, B. [1 ,2 ]
Gheewala, S. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm JGSEE, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[2] Minist Higher Educ Sci Res & Innovat, Ctr Energy Technol & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Natl Sci & Technol Dev Agcy NSTDA, Org Strategy Management Div, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
关键词
Wood pellet; Fast growing tree; Thailand; BIOMASS; COPPICE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sufficient quantity of raw materials is a critical factor for wood pellet production. The recommendations from past research on biomass have indicated that the cultivation of fast growing trees should be encouraged in wasteland. Leucaena and Acacia are the popular fast growing trees in Thailand because they are resistant to drought and can grow in low quality soil. Wood from them has a high heating value and entrepreneurs invite farmers to grow these varieties on contract farming for renewable energy. The purpose of this study is to assess the environmental and socio-economic of wood pellet production from Leucaena and Acacia. The environmental impacts were evaluated by cradle to gate life cycle assessment, covering fast growing tree cultivation (sprout preparation, plantation, cutting), transportation and wood pellet production. The ReCiPe2016 Midpoint method (version 1.02) was used to evaluate the environmental impacts of one tonne wood pellet production from Leucaena and Acacia. The indicators of socio-economic considered in this study were the profit from cultivation, economic assessment of wood pellet production (net present value, internal rate of return, payback period, discount payback period and benefit cost ratio) and opportunity of employment. The environmental results showed a better performance of wood pellets made from Leucaena are better than Acacia. The production capacity of 110 tonnes per day of wood pellet factory would return a profit when the price of raw material is less than 1,300 THB per tonne. Finally, Leucaena and Acacia cultivation increase the opportunity of employment at 0.16 and 0.10 person-year per ha, respectively. The wood pellet production increases the opportunity of employment at 0.0019 person-year per tonne. Considering the results of the environmental and socio-economic assessment, Leucaena is seen to be better than Acacia and should be supported as an alternative raw material for wood pellet production.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Socio-Economic and Environmental Analyses of Solar Irrigation Systems for Sustainable Agricultural Production
    Guno, Charmaine Samala
    Agaton, Casper Boongaling
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [42] Assessment of the Socio-Economic Impact of the Implementation of Regional Environmental Programs for Waste Management
    Filatov, Vladimir V.
    Zaitseva, Natalia A.
    Larionova, Anna A.
    Maykova, Svetlana E.
    Kozlovskikh, Lidia A.
    Avtonova, Vera Y.
    Vikhrova, Natalia O.
    EKOLOJI, 2019, 28 (107): : 267 - 273
  • [43] INTEGRATING AN ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BROWNFIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
    Cappai, F.
    Forgues, D.
    Glaus, M.
    EXPANDING BOUNDARIES: SYSTEMS THINKING IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2016, : 608 - 614
  • [44] Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis
    Pery, A. R. R.
    Schueuermann, G.
    Ciffroy, P.
    Faust, M.
    Backhaus, T.
    Aicher, L.
    Mombelli, E.
    Tebby, C.
    Cronin, M. T. D.
    Tissot, S.
    Andres, S.
    Brignon, J. M.
    Frewer, L.
    Georgiou, S.
    Mattas, K.
    Vergnaud, J. C.
    Peijnenburg, W.
    Capri, E.
    Marchis, A.
    Wilks, M. F.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 456 : 307 - 316
  • [45] Global experience with jatropha cultivation for bioenergy: An assessment of socio-economic and environmental aspects
    van Eijck, Janske
    Romijn, Henny
    Balkema, Annelies
    Faaij, Andre
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 32 : 869 - 889
  • [46] Integrated Renewable Energy Systems for Buildings: An Assessment of the Environmental and Socio-Economic Sustainability
    Gabbar, Hossam A.
    Ramadan, A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [47] Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment of Biomass Pellets Biofuel in Hazara Division, Pakistan
    Hassan, Maaz
    Usman, Naveed
    Hussain, Majid
    Yousaf, Adnan
    Khattak, Muhammad Aamad
    Yousaf, Sidra
    Mishr, Rankeshwarnath Sanjay
    Ahmad, Sana
    Rehman, Fariha
    Rashedi, Ahmad
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [48] Fast growing plantations for wood production - integration of ecological effects and economic perspectives
    Bredemeier, Michael
    Busch, Gerald
    Hartmann, Linda
    Jansen, Martin
    Richter, Falk
    Lamersdorf, Norbert P.
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 3
  • [49] From indices to impacts using environmental and socio-economic clustering in Kenya
    Odongo, Rhoda A.
    De Moel, Hans
    Wens, Marthe
    Coumou, Dim
    Limones, Natalia
    Otieno, Viola
    Van Loon, Anne F.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2025, 58
  • [50] Global socio-economic losses and environmental gains from the Coronavirus pandemic
    Lenzen, Manfred
    Li, Mengyu
    Malik, Arunima
    Pomponi, Francesco
    Sun, Ya-Yen
    Wiedmann, Thomas
    Faturay, Futu
    Fry, Jacob
    Gallego, Blanca
    Geschke, Arne
    Gomez-Paredes, Jorge
    Kanemoto, Keiichiro
    Kenway, Steven
    Nansai, Keisuke
    Prokopenko, Mikhail
    Wakiyama, Takako
    Wang, Yafei
    Yousefzadeh, Moslem
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):