A case study of observations of volcanic ash from the Eyjafjallajokull eruption: 1. In situ airborne observations

被引:44
|
作者
Turnbull, Kate [1 ]
Johnson, Ben [1 ]
Marenco, Franco [1 ]
Haywood, Jim [1 ,2 ]
Minikin, Andreas [3 ,5 ]
Weinzierl, Bernadett [3 ,5 ]
Schlager, Hans [3 ,5 ]
Schumann, Ulrich [3 ,5 ]
Leadbetter, Susan
Woolley, Alan [4 ]
机构
[1] Met Off, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England
[3] DLR, Inst Phys Atmosphare, D-82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Wessling, Germany
[4] FAAM, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[5] Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt, Inst Phys Atmosphare, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
关键词
AIRCRAFT OBSERVATIONS; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; SAHARAN DUST; RADIATIVE PROPERTIES; AEROSOL; CLOUD; INSTRUMENT; AERONET; CLOSURE; OZONE;
D O I
10.1029/2011JD016688
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
On 17 May 2010, the FAAM BAe-146 aircraft made remote and in situ measurements of the volcanic ash cloud from Eyjafjallajokull over the southern North Sea. The Falcon 20E aircraft operated by Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) also sampled the ash cloud on the same day. While no "wingtip-to-wingtip" co-ordination was performed, the proximity of the two aircraft allows worthwhile comparisons. Despite the high degree of inhomogeneity (e. g., column ash loadings varied by a factor of three over similar to 100 km) the range of ash mass concentrations and the ratios between volcanic ash mass and concentrations of SO2, O-3 and CO were consistent between the two aircraft and within expected instrumental uncertainties. The data show strong correlations between ash mass, SO2 concentration and aerosol scattering with the FAAM BAe-146 data providing a specific extinction coefficient of 0.6-0.8 m(2) g(-1). There were significant differences in the observed ash size distribution with FAAM BAe-146 data showing a peak in the mass at similar to 3.5 mu m (volume-equivalent diameter) and DLR data peaking at similar to 10 mu m. Differences could not be accounted for by refractive index and shape assumptions alone. The aircraft in situ and lidar data suggest peak ash concentrations of 500-800 mu g m(-3) with a factor of two uncertainty. Comparing the location of ash observations with the ash dispersion model output highlights differences that demonstrate the difficulties in forecasting such events and the essential nature of validating models using high quality observational data from platforms such as the FAAM BAe-146 and the DLR Falcon.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modelling of volcanic ash with HYSPLIT and satellite observations: a case study of the 2018 Barren Island volcano eruption event, Andaman Territory, India
    Gunda, Goutham Krishna Teja
    Champatiray, P. K.
    Chauhan, Mamta
    Chauhan, Prakash
    Ansary, Mijanur
    Singh, Arya
    Ketholia, Yateesh
    Balaji, S.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 121 (04): : 529 - 538
  • [22] Including ash in UKESM1 model simulations of the Raikoke volcanic eruption reveals improved agreement with observations
    Wells, Alice F.
    Jones, Andy
    Osborne, Martin
    Damany-Pearce, Lilly
    Partridge, Daniel G.
    Haywood, James M.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2023, 23 (07) : 3985 - 4007
  • [23] Tephra sedimentation during the 2010 Eyjafjallajokull eruption (Iceland) from deposit, radar, and satellite observations
    Bonadonna, C.
    Genco, R.
    Gouhier, M.
    Pistolesi, M.
    Cioni, R.
    Alfano, F.
    Hoskuldsson, A.
    Ripepe, M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2011, 116
  • [24] Simulation and observations of stratospheric aerosols from the 2009 Sarychev volcanic eruption
    Kravitz, Ben
    Robock, Alan
    Bourassa, Adam
    Deshler, Terry
    Wu, Decheng
    Mattis, Ina
    Finger, Fanny
    Hoffmann, Anne
    Ritter, Christoph
    Bitar, Lubna
    Duck, Thomas J.
    Barnes, John E.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2011, 116
  • [25] Charge structure in volcanic plumes: a comparison of plume properties predicted by an integral plume model to observations of volcanic lightning during the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajokull, Iceland
    Woodhouse, Mark J.
    Behnke, Sonja A.
    BULLETIN OF VOLCANOLOGY, 2014, 76 (08) : 1 - 21
  • [26] Evaluating the structure and magnitude of the ash plume during the initial phase of the 2010 Eyjafjallajokull eruption using lidar observations and NAME simulations
    Dacre, H. F.
    Grant, A. L. M.
    Hogan, R. J.
    Belcher, S. E.
    Thomson, D. J.
    Devenish, B. J.
    Marenco, F.
    Hort, M. C.
    Haywood, J. M.
    Ansmann, A.
    Mattis, I.
    Clarisse, L.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2011, 116
  • [27] Volcanic ash over the Russian Federation territory after the volcanic eruption in Iceland on April 14, 2010 from the data of model simulations and observations
    A. V. Gan’shin
    A. N. Luk’yanov
    V. U. Khattatov
    I. A. Veselovskii
    N. N. Volkov
    Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 2012, 37 : 598 - 603
  • [28] Volcanic ash over the Russian Federation territory after the volcanic eruption in Iceland on April 14, 2010 from the data of model simulations and observations
    Gan'shin, A. V.
    Luk'yanov, A. N.
    Khattatov, V. U.
    Veselovskii, I. A.
    Volkov, N. N.
    RUSSIAN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 2012, 37 (09) : 598 - 603
  • [29] Validation of ash optical depth and layer height retrieved from passive satellite sensors using EARLINET and airborne lidar data: the case of the Eyjafjallajokull eruption
    Balis, Dimitris
    Koukouli, Maria-Elissavet
    Siomos, Nikolaos
    Dimopoulos, Spyridon
    Mona, Lucia
    Pappalardo, Gelsomina
    Marenco, Franco
    Clarisse, Lieven
    Ventress, Lucy J.
    Carboni, Elisa
    Grainger, Roy G.
    Wang, Ping
    Tilstra, Gijsbert
    Ronald van der, A.
    Theys, Nicolas
    Zehner, Claus
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (09) : 5705 - 5720
  • [30] Analyses of in-situ airborne volcanic ash from the February 2000 eruption of Hekla Volcano, Iceland -: art. no. 1772
    Pieri, D
    Ma, C
    Simpson, JJ
    Hufford, G
    Grindle, T
    Grove, C
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (16) : 19 - 1