Optimization schemes for grassland ecosystem services under climate change

被引:18
|
作者
Hao, Ruifang [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Deyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Coll Resources Sci & Technol,CHESS, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Arid and semiarid area; Tradeoff; Scenario simulation; Grazing intensity; Optimization; Sustainability; INNER-MONGOLIA; CHINA; MODEL; SENSITIVITY; BIOMASS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.012
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem and associated services in arid and semiarid areas are sensitive to climate change and human activities. Guiding human activities based on the optimization of ecosystem services can help humans adapt to climate change effectively, which is vital for regional sustainability. We evaluated the distribution of five ecosystem services: net primary productivity (NPP), soil conservation (SC), water yield (WY), water retention (WR), and livestock supply in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China (GAPTZ) under the future climate scenarios of representative concentration pathway (RCP) 4.5 and RCP8.5 in 2050. We designed the four grazing-intensity scenarios of ungrazed (UG), lightly grazed (LG), moderately grazed (MG), and heavily grazed (HG) and analyzed the impacts of climate change and grazing on the ecosystem services. Finally, we presented the optimization schemes of grazing intensity in the GAPTZ under the objectives of "strong sustainability" and "weak sustainability". "Strong sustainability" objective means that the total change rate of ecosystem services compared to the ungrazed scenario is maximal and should not be less than 0. "Weak sustainability" objective means that the livestock supply is preferential and the total change rate of ecosystem services compared to the ungrazed scenario is maximal but could be less than 0. The results showed that both climate change and grazing exert great influence on the supply and interrelation of ecosystem services. In the northeast of the GAPTZ, LG and MG can stimulate grassland to tiller and enlarge ecosystem services integrally. HG has the severest negative effect on ecosystem services overall. Under the "weak sustainability" objective, LG can be widely adopted in the GAPTZ. Under the "strong sustainability" objective, grazing should be limited in the northwestern and north central GAPTZ. Reasonable planning of grazing intensity and its spatial patterns can promote effective utilization of grassland resource and realization of regional sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1169
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Context of Adaptation to Climate Change
    van de Sand, Isabel
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (01):
  • [22] The impact of climate change on California's ecosystem services
    Shaw, M. Rebecca
    Pendleton, Linwood
    Cameron, D. Richard
    Morris, Belinda
    Bachelet, Dominique
    Klausmeyer, Kirk
    MacKenzie, Jason
    Conklin, David R.
    Bratman, Gregrory N.
    Lenihan, James
    Haunreiter, Erik
    Daly, Christopher
    Roehrdanz, Patrick R.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 109 : 465 - 484
  • [23] The impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in southern California
    Underwood, Emma C.
    Hollander, Allan D.
    Safford, Hugh D.
    Kim, John B.
    Srivastava, Lorie
    Drapek, Ray J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [24] Urban ecosystem services and climate change: a dynamic interplay
    Pandey, Bhanu
    Ghosh, Annesha
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2023, 5
  • [25] The effects of climate change on biotic interactions and ecosystem services
    Montoya, Jose M.
    Raffaelli, Dave
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1549) : 2011 - 2011
  • [26] Can Ecosystem Services Thinking Help with Climate Change?
    Beardsley, Timothy M.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (05) : 371 - 371
  • [27] VALUING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    Krupnick, Alan
    McLaughlin, David
    CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2012, 3 (04)
  • [28] The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services
    M. Rebecca Shaw
    Linwood Pendleton
    D. Richard Cameron
    Belinda Morris
    Dominique Bachelet
    Kirk Klausmeyer
    Jason MacKenzie
    David R. Conklin
    Gregrory N. Bratman
    James Lenihan
    Erik Haunreiter
    Christopher Daly
    Patrick R. Roehrdanz
    Climatic Change, 2011, 109 : 465 - 484
  • [29] Aerosol climate change effects on land ecosystem services
    Unger, N.
    Yue, X.
    Harper, K. L.
    FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2017, 200 : 121 - 142
  • [30] The cost of climate change: Ecosystem services and wildland fires
    Lee, Christine
    Schlemme, Claire
    Murray, Jessica
    Unsworth, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 116 : 261 - 269