Climate Policy and Innovation in the Absence of Commitment

被引:5
|
作者
Datta, Ashokankur [1 ]
Somanathan, E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shiv Nadar Univ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Econ, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Indian Stat Inst, Econ & Planning Unit, Delhi, India
[3] South Asian Network Dev & Environm Econ, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
Climate; Commitment; Emissions tax; Innovation; Policy instruments; R&D; Tradable permits; POLLUTION-CONTROL; TECHNOLOGY; PERMITS; INCENTIVES; CHOICE; TAXES; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1086/688510
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We compare the effects of price and quantity instruments (an emissions tax and a quota with tradable permits) on the incentive to innovate to reduce the cost of an emission-free technology. We assume that the government cannot commit to the level of a policy instrument before R&D occurs but sets the level to be socially optimal after the results of R&D are realized. The equivalence of price and quantity instruments in inducing innovation that is seen in end-of-pipe abatement models does not hold. When the marginal cost of the dirty technology is constant, then a quota can induce R&D, but a tax is completely ineffective. However, if the marginal cost function of the dirty technology is steep enough, then both a tax and a quotawith tradable permits can induce R&D, and the tax will do so in a wider range of circumstances. Furthermore, in this case, an R&D subsidy may induce R&D and raise welfare whether a tax or a quota regime is in place.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 955
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条