The comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts with free gingival grafts in the augmentation of pen-implant attached mucosa: a randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Basegmez, Cansu [1 ]
Karabuda, Zihni Cuneyt [2 ]
Demirel, Korkud [3 ]
Yalcin, Serdar [4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Implantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Oral Implantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Dept Periodontol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Oral lmplantol, TR-34390 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
acellular dermal matrix; free gingival graft; peri-implant keratinised mucosa; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; PARAMETERS; TISSUE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of two techniques for enhancing pen-implant keratinised mucosa: acellular dermal matrix allograft versus free gingival grafts. Materials and methods: Thirty-six patients having implant sites with less than 1.5 mm of keratinised mucosa width were randomly assigned to two groups. Thirty-six implants placed in 18 patients received acellular dermal matrix allografts (ADM group), while 36 implants placed in 18 individuals received free gingival grafts (FGG group). Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD) and the width of attached mucosa (WAM) were measured at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months following surgery. Results: WAM in the FGG group was significantly greater than the ADM group at 3 (P = 0.026) and 6 months (P < 0.001). In the EGG group, final gain of WAM was greater (1.58 mm in ADM group, 2.57 mm in FGG group) (P < 0.001) and postoperative relapse was smaller (2.68 mm in the ADM group, 1.73 mm in the FGG group) (P < 0.001). PI and GI scores were greater in the ADM group at 6 months (P = 0.016 and P = 0.61, respectively). The FGG group demonstrated a greater PD value at 3 months (P < 0.001), however there was no significant difference between the groups at 6 months (P = 0.317). Conclusions: Although ADM allografts are capable of increasing the width of pen-implant keratinised mucosa, FGGs seem to be more effective. ADM allografts may be the application of choice at implant sites in need of major grafts and in patients where a donor site should be avoided for medical or psychological reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [41] Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation: 6 to 8 year follow-up
    McGuire, Michael K.
    Scheyer, E. Todd
    Lipton, David, I
    Gunsolley, John C.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 92 (08) : 1088 - 1095
  • [42] Root coverage of multiple gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap associated with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix or connective tissue graft: a 6-month split-mouth controlled and randomized clinical trial
    Maluta, Renato
    Monteiro, Mabelle Freitas
    Peruzzo, Daiane Cristina
    Joly, Julio Cesar
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (10) : 5765 - 5773
  • [43] Root coverage of multiple gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap associated with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix or connective tissue graft: a 6-month split-mouth controlled and randomized clinical trial
    Renato Maluta
    Mabelle Freitas Monteiro
    Daiane Cristina Peruzzo
    Julio Cesar Joly
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 5765 - 5773
  • [44] Correction: Three-dimensional changes of a porcine collagen matrix and free gingival grafts for soft tissue augmentation to increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical study
    Ausra Ramanauskaite
    Karina Obreja
    Katharina Melissa Müller
    Carla Schliephake
    Johanna Wieland
    Amira Begic
    Iulia Dahmer
    Puria Parvini
    Frank Schwarz
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9
  • [45] ASO Visual Abstract: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM
    Ng, Trina Priscilla
    Loo, Brandon Yong Kiat
    Yong, Nicole
    Chia, Clement Luck Khng
    Lohsiriwat, Visnu
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (08) : 5222 - 5223
  • [46] Cost Analysis of Post-Mastectomy Reconstruction: A Comparison of Immediate Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant and Two-Stage Tissue Expander-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Vs Abdominal Based Perforator Free Flap
    Tran, Bao Ngoc N.
    Singhal, Dhruv
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : E106 - E106
  • [47] Three-dimensional changes of a porcine collagen matrix and free gingival grafts for soft tissue augmentation to increase the width of keratinized tissue around dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical study (vol 9, 13, 2023)
    Ramanauskaite, Ausra
    Obreja, Karina
    Mueller, Katharina Melissa
    Schliephake, Carla
    Wieland, Johanna
    Begic, Amira
    Dahmer, Iulia
    Parvini, Puria
    Schwarz, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2023, 9 (01)