Sex-sorting sperm by flow cytometry in pigs: Issues and perspectives

被引：46

作者：

Vazquez, J. M. ^{[1
]}

Parrilla, I. ^{[1
]}

Roca, J. ^{[1
]}

Gil, M. A. ^{[1
]}

Cuello, C. ^{[1
]}

Vazquez, J. L. ^{[1
]}

Martinez, E. A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Murcia, Fac Vet Med, Dept Anim Med & Surg, E-30071 Murcia, Spain

来源：

THERIOGENOLOGY | 2009年 / 71卷 / 01期

关键词：

Sperm sexing; Swine; PSP-I/PSP-II; Deep intrauterine insemination; Laparoscopic insemination; SORTED BOAR SPERMATOZOA; DEEP INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; CHROMOSOME-BEARING SPERMATOZOA; LOW-DOSE INSEMINATION; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; PSP-I/PSP-II; SEMINAL PLASMA; ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; FUNCTIONAL INTEGRITY; MAMMALIAN SPERM;

D O I：

10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.044

中图分类号：

Q [生物科学];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Several hundred thousand offspring of preselected sex of various species have been born since sperm sexing technology based on flow cytometric sorting of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm and DNA was first demonstrated in 1989. The advantages derived from application of sexing technology to commercial dairy cattle production have been demonstrated worldwide. Utilizing sex-sorting technology for pig production systems offers many similar advantages. However, several factors currently limit implementation of sexing technology in pigs. Anatomical and physiological features inherent to the female pig, together with the relatively low sperm output of a flow sorter, are the main limitations to widespread use of this technology in pig production systems. This review analyzes the factors that limit the efficiency of sperm sorting technology for commercial swine production. In addition, this review discusses recent innovations in technical instrumentation and applied reproductive techniques that may help to overcome some of these limitations. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：80 / 88

页数：9

共 50 条

[31] EFFECTS OF REMOVING SEMINAL PLASMA DURING 8-h STORAGE BEFORE SEX-SORTING BOVINE SPERM
Burroughs, C. A.
Evans, K. M.
Lenz, R. W.
Seidel, G. E.
REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 24 (01) : 213 - 213
[32] Effects of sex-sorting and sperm dosage on conception rates of Holstein heifers: Is comparable fertility of sex-sorted and conventional semen plausible?
DeJarnette, J. M.
Leach, M. A.
Nebel, R. L.
Marshall, C. E.
McCleary, C. R.
Moreno, J. F.
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (07) : 3477 - 3483
[33] Optimization of protocols for Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) sperm handling before sex sorting by flow cytometry
Anel-Lopez, Luis
Garcia-Alvarez, Olga
Maroto-Morales, Alejandro
Tarantini, Tatiana
Del Olmo, David
Ortiz, Jose Antonio
Martinez, Emilio Arsenio
Roca, Jordi
Vazquez, Juan Maria
Garde, Jose Julian
Parrilla, Inmaculada
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2017, 92 : 129 - 136
[34] A Fluorescent Sex-Sorting Technique for Insects with the Demonstration in Drosophila melanogaster
Liu, Junru
Rayes, Danny
Akbari, Omar S.
GEN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 3 (01): : 35 - 44
[35] Effect of 2 sex-sorting time schedules on SIT facility management
Malfacini, Marco
Puggioli, Arianna
Balestrino, Fabrizio
Carrieri, Marco
Dindo, Maria Luisa
Bellini, Romeo
JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE, 2023, 23 (05)
[36] HUMAN SPERM SEX SELECTION - SAFETY OF HUMAN SPERM SELECTION BY FLOW-CYTOMETRY
ASHWOODSMITH, MJ
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1994, 9 (05) : 757 - 757
[37] Development of Procedures for Sex-sorting Frozen-Thawed Bovine Spermatozoa
Underwood, S. L.
Bathgate, R.
Maxwell, W. M. C.
Evans, G.
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2009, 44 (03) : 460 - 466
[38] Sex-sorting of boar spermatozoa does not influence the localization of glucose transporters
Tamanini, Carlo
Bucci, Diego
Galeati, Giovanna
Giaretta, Elisa
Spinaci, Marcella
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 13 (04) : 341 - 343
[39] FLOW-CYTOMETRY AND SORTING
PINKEL, D
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1982, 54 (03) : A503 - &
[40] Flow cytometry and cell sorting
Ibrahim, Sherrif F.
van den Engh, Ger
CELL SEPARATION: FUNDAMENTALS, ANALYTICAL AND PREPARATIVE METHODS, 2007, 106 : 19 - 39

← 1 2 3 4 5 →