The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version

被引:17
|
作者
Poosiripinyo, Thanate [1 ]
Paholpak, Permsak [1 ]
Jirarattanaphochai, Kitti [1 ]
Kosuwon, Weerachai [1 ]
Sirichativapee, Winai [1 ]
Wisanuyotin, Taweechok [1 ]
Laupattarakasem, Pat [1 ]
Sukhonthamarn, Kamolsak [1 ]
Jeeravipoolvarn, Polasak [1 ]
Sakakibara, Toshihiko [2 ]
Kasai, Yuichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Orthoped, Fac Med, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] Mie Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Spinal Surg & Biomed Engn, Tsu, Mie, Japan
关键词
CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; HEALTH SURVEY; VALIDITY; QUALITY; SF-36; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2016.10.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was developed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) for assessment of lower back pain and lumbar spinal disease. We aimed to translate the JOABPEQ into Thai and test its reliability and validity in the Thai context. Methods: The original JOABPEQ was translated into Thai in accordance with international recommendations. Then 180 lumbar spinal disease patients (mean age 58.58 +/- 11.97, 68.3% female) were asked to complete the Thai version of the JOABPEQ twice at 2-week intervals. Test-retest reliability was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistencies were analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, while the construct validity was compared with the Thai version of the modified SF-36, and tested using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results: The Thai JOABPEQ showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in all parameters (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient 0.761-0.862). The variables low back pain, walking ability, social life function, and mental health had satisfactory internal consistency (the respective Cronbach's alpha was 0.798, 0.721, 0.707, and 0.795). Only the lumbar function parameter showed moderate reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.654). All of the variables in the Thai JOABPEQ had a statistically positive correlation with the correspondent Thai SF-36 subscales (Spearman's rank correlation p value < 0.05). Conclusion: The Thai version of JOABPEQ had satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity; it can be used as a reliable tool for assessing quality of life for lumbar spinal disease patients in Thailand. (C) 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 37
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of the Japanese Version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire
    Shimazu, Akihito
    Sonnentag, Sabine
    Kubota, Kazumi
    Kawakami, Norito
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2012, 54 (03) : 196 - 205
  • [42] Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire
    Wilartratsami, Sirichai
    Santipas, Borriwat
    Jerapornprapa, Rutchchayuth
    Vamvanij, Visit
    Luksanapruksa, Panya
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (05) : E338 - E343
  • [43] Validation of the Persian version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire in patients with low back pain
    Rostami, Mohsen
    Noorian, Negin
    Mansournia, Mohammad Ali
    Sharafi, Elham
    Babaki, Amir Eslami Shahr
    Kordi, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 27 (02) : 213 - 221
  • [44] Italian version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire for Low Back Pain: translation, cultural adaptation and validation
    D'Onofrio, Angelica
    Pigliapoco, Elisa
    Torcisi, Raimondo
    Troiani, Alessandro
    Libertini, Tania
    Politi, Stefano
    Marsocci, Antonio
    Castiglia, Stefano F.
    Magnifica, Fabrizio
    MINERVA ORTHOPEDICS, 2023, 74 (01): : 37 - 43
  • [45] Validation of the Arabic Version of the Attitude Toward Education and Advice for Low Back Pain Questionnaire
    Alhowimel, Ahmed S.
    Ogbeivor, Collins
    Alruwaili, Ahmad Dalli
    Morizn, Omar M.
    Aljamaan, Abdulaziz
    Alenazi, Aqeel M.
    Alhwoaimel, Norah A.
    Alshehri, Mohammed M.
    Alqahtani, Bader A.
    Alodaibi, Faris A.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2024, 18 : 999 - 1007
  • [46] Validation of the Yoruba Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
    Fatoye, Francis
    Mbada, Chidozie Emmanuel
    Oladayo, Timothy Oluwaseun
    Idowu, Opeyemi Ayodiipo
    Oyewole, Olufemi O.
    Fatoye, Clara
    Oke, Kayode Israel
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (09) : E528 - E533
  • [47] Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
    Komon, Wanchat
    Manonai, Jittima
    Kijmanawat, Athasit
    Silpakit, Chatchawan
    Tunkoon, Bhatarachit
    Jengprasert, Ketkaew
    Sarit-apirak, Sirirat
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (11) : 3045 - 3052
  • [48] Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
    Komon, W.
    Kijmanawat, A.
    Tunkoon, B.
    Jengprasert, K.
    Saritapirak, S.
    Silpakit, C.
    Manonai, J.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S133 - S133
  • [49] Validation of the Thai version of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire (PIKQ)
    Wanchat Komon
    Jittima Manonai
    Athasit Kijmanawat
    Chatchawan Silpakit
    Bhatarachit Tunkoon
    Ketkaew Jengprasert
    Sirirat Sarit-apirak
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 3045 - 3052
  • [50] Validation of the Tunisian version of the Dallas pain questionnaire
    Bejia, I
    Zrour, S
    Touzi, M
    Bergaoui, N
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 534 - 534