The use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in phase III breast cancer trials

被引:10
|
作者
Brim, Remy L. [1 ]
Pearson, Steven D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Bioeth, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Inst Clin & Econ Review, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1177/1740774513475529
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase Ill breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed. gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. Clinical Trials 2013; 10: 243-249. http://ctj.sagepub.com
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Reporting in Breast Reconstruction A Scoping Literature Review
    Biswas, Sonali
    Mullikin, Alexandria
    Phillips, Brett T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (05) : 501 - 505
  • [42] Systematic Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Protocol Content and Reporting in Cancer Trials
    Kyte, Derek
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Keeley, Thomas
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam W.
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Efficace, Fabio
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Turner, Grace
    Calvert, Melanie
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2019, 111 (11): : 1170 - 1178
  • [43] The value of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Rowe, Anna
    Newsome, Philip N.
    Douglas-Pugh, Jessica
    Khan, Sheeba
    Mittal, Saloni
    Wilson, Roger
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Campbell, Lisa
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Calvert, Melanie
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2022, 28 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [44] The use of wearable sensors and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer research: A literature survey
    Dumais, Kelly
    Jagodinsky, Adam
    Khakwani, Saima
    Bonaker, Rebecca
    McDowell, Bryan
    Sowalsky, Kristen
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [45] The value of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials
    Ameeta Retzer
    Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
    Anna Rowe
    Philip N. Newsome
    Jessica Douglas-Pugh
    Sheeba Khan
    Saloni Mittal
    Roger Wilson
    Daniel O’Connor
    Lisa Campbell
    Sandra A. Mitchell
    Melanie Calvert
    Nature Medicine, 2022, 28 : 18 - 20
  • [46] REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PHASE II ONCOLOGY CLINICAL TRIALS
    Finnern, H. W.
    Danheiser, S.
    Barkalow, F.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 183 - 183
  • [47] REVIEW OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PHASE II ONCOLOGY CLINICAL TRIALS
    Danheiser, S.
    Barkalow, F.
    Finnern, H. W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A275 - A275
  • [48] Incorporation of patient-reported outcomes in early-phase clinical trials for childhood and adolescent cancer
    Vilaplana, Andrea
    Morell, Mariona
    Valero-Arrese, Lorena
    Marshall, Lynley V.
    Salo, Anna
    Crowe, Tracey
    Romero, Laura
    de Rojas, Teresa
    Carceller, Fernando
    Moreno, Lucas
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2024, 71 (09)
  • [49] Statistical challenges in drug approval trials that use patient-reported outcomes
    Izem, Rima
    Kammerman, Lisa A.
    Komo, Scott
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (05) : 398 - 408
  • [50] Patient-reported outcomes in phase II cancer clinical trials: Lessons learned and future directions
    Wagner, Lynne I.
    Wenzel, Lari
    Shaw, Edward
    Cella, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (32) : 5058 - 5062