The use and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in phase III breast cancer trials

被引:10
|
作者
Brim, Remy L. [1 ]
Pearson, Steven D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NIH, Dept Bioeth, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, Inst Clin & Econ Review, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1177/1740774513475529
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Public and government attention to patient-centered research outcomes has been increasing, evidenced by the recent formation of the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Drug development clinical trials can be made more patient-centered by collecting patient-reported outcome measures that can inform decision making by patients and their health-care providers. Patient-reported outcomes are important to collect in trials of breast cancer therapeutics, which encompass a wide range of treatment regimens and side effects. Purpose We sought to determine recent trends in the use of patient-reported outcomes in drug trials for the treatment of breast cancer and evaluate the reporting of these data in study publications. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase Ill breast cancer drug trials, recording information on start date, primary completion date, primary outcome measure, primary sponsor, stage of cancer, and patient-reported outcome use. To assess the reporting of patient-reported outcome data, Google.com and PubMed. gov were searched for all publications resulting from included trials. Results We found 236 eligible trials, starting between May 1989 and December 2011. Of these trials, 83 (35%) stipulated patient-reported outcome use. The rate of patient-reported outcome use in recent years has shown no increase over earlier time periods: 37% (1989-2000) versus 36% (2004-2007) versus 30% (2008-2011) (p = 0.8). Trials with sponsorship led by the pharmaceutical industry and trials including patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease had the highest rates of patient-reported outcome use (40/87 (46%) and 44/102 (43%), respectively). Among the 83 trials that collected patient-reported outcome measures, 36 were completed a minimum of 2 years before our analysis; of these 36 studies, 19 (53%) had published patient-reported outcome data. Limitations Data were limited to self-reported descriptions of trials listed on the ClinicalTrial.gov database, which is the best compendium of trial information available, but it is neither a complete nor a fully accurate record of all trials. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome use and reporting in breast cancer drug trials has remained relatively low despite calls for more patient-centered research. Increasing the collection and availability of patient-reported outcome data to guide clinical decisions will require aligned support from trial sponsors, researchers, journal editors, regulators and patient advocacy groups, who can all play important roles in implementing change. Clinical Trials 2013; 10: 243-249. http://ctj.sagepub.com
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of patient-reported outcomes in phase III cancer treatment trials: Lessons learned and future directions
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Gotay, Carolyn C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (32) : 5063 - 5069
  • [2] Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Trials of Palliative Radiotherapy A Systematic Review
    Fabian, Alexander
    Domschikowski, Justus
    Letsch, Anne
    Schmalz, Claudia
    Freitag-Wolf, Sandra
    Dunst, Juergen
    Krug, David
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (09) : E2231930
  • [3] Guidelines for the Use and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials
    Laane, Edward
    Salek, Sam
    Oliva, Esther Natalie
    Bennink, Christine
    Clavreul, Solene
    Richardson, Paul G.
    Scheid, Christof
    Weisel, Katja
    Ionova, Tatyana
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [4] Timely Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: An Ethical Imperative
    Blackstone, Eric C.
    Efficace, Fabio
    Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.
    Abel, Gregory A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 43 (10)
  • [5] Should patient-reported outcomes be mandatory for toxicity reporting in cancer clinical trials?
    Bruner, Deborah Watkins
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (34) : 5345 - 5347
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
    Tevis, Sarah E.
    James, Ted A.
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Yao, Katharine A.
    Merlino, James
    Dietz, Jill
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (10) : 2839 - 2845
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Cancer
    Sarah E. Tevis
    Ted A. James
    Henry M. Kuerer
    Andrea L. Pusic
    Katharine A. Yao
    James Merlino
    Jill Dietz
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2839 - 2845
  • [8] The use of patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer clinical trials: a review of the published literature
    Turner-Bowker, Diane M.
    Hao, Yanni
    Foley, Catherine
    Galipeau, Nina
    Mazar, Iyar
    Krohe, Meaghan
    Globe, Denise
    Shields, Alan L.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2016, 32 (10) : 1709 - 1717
  • [9] Strong compliance with electronic patient-reported (ePRO) reporting in multinational breast cancer trials
    Dallabrida, S.
    Gary, S. T.
    Otero, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S409 - S410
  • [10] Patient-Reported Outcomes for Tolerability Assessment in Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials
    Basch, Ethan
    Yap, Christina
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (08): : 943 - 944